dc.description.abstract | Background: Regression calibration as a method for handling measurement error is becoming
increasingly well-known and used in epidemiologic research. However, the standard version of the
method is not appropriate for exposure analyzed on a categorical (e.g. quintile) scale, an approach
commonly used in epidemiologic studies. A tempting solution could then be to use the predicted
continuous exposure obtained through the regression calibration method and treat it as an
approximation to the true exposure, that is, include the categorized calibrated exposure in the
main regression analysis.
Methods: We use semi-analytical calculations and simulations to evaluate the performance of the
proposed approach compared to the naive approach of not correcting for measurement error, in
situations where analyses are performed on quintile scale and when incorporating the original scale
into the categorical variables, respectively. We also present analyses of real data, containing
measures of folate intake and depression, from the Norwegian Women and Cancer study
(NOWAC).
Results: In cases where extra information is available through replicated measurements and not
validation data, regression calibration does not maintain important qualities of the true exposure
distribution, thus estimates of variance and percentiles can be severely biased. We show that the
outlined approach maintains much, in some cases all, of the misclassification found in the observed
exposure. For that reason, regression analysis with the corrected variable included on a categorical
scale is still biased. In some cases the corrected estimates are analytically equal to those obtained
by the naive approach. Regression calibration is however vastly superior to the naive method when
applying the medians of each category in the analysis.
Conclusion: Regression calibration in its most well-known form is not appropriate for
measurement error correction when the exposure is analyzed on a percentile scale. Relating back
to the original scale of the exposure solves the problem. The conclusion regards all regression
models. | en |