Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHülter, Nils Fredrik
dc.contributor.authorSørum, Vidar
dc.contributor.authorBorch-Pedersen, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorLiljegren, Mikkel Meyn
dc.contributor.authorUtnes, Ane
dc.contributor.authorPrimicerio, Raul
dc.contributor.authorHarms, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Pål Jarle
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-14T08:49:53Z
dc.date.available2017-06-14T08:49:53Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-15
dc.description.abstractBackground <br> Natural transformation enables acquisition of adaptive traits and drives genome evolution in prokaryotes. Yet, the selective forces responsible for the evolution and maintenance of natural transformation remain elusive since taken-up DNA has also been hypothesized to provide benefits such as nutrients or templates for DNA repair to individual cells. <br> Results <br> We investigated the immediate effects of DNA uptake and recombination on the naturally competent bacterium Acinetobacter baylyi in both benign and genotoxic conditions. In head-to-head competition experiments between DNA uptake-proficient and -deficient strains, we observed a fitness benefit of DNA uptake independent of UV stress. This benefit was found with both homologous and heterologous DNA and was independent of recombination. Recombination with taken-up DNA reduced survival of transformed cells with increasing levels of UV-stress through interference with nucleotide excision repair, suggesting that DNA strand breaks occur during recombination attempts with taken-up DNA. Consistent with this, we show that absence of RecBCD and RecFOR recombinational DNA repair pathways strongly decrease natural transformation. Conclusions: <br> Our data show a physiological benefit of DNA uptake unrelated to recombination. In contrast, recombination during transformation is a strand break inducing process that represents a previously unrecognized cost of natural transformation.en_US
dc.descriptionSource at <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-0953-2> http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-0953-2 </a>en_US
dc.identifier.citationHülter N, Sørum VAY, Borch-Pedersen K, Liljegren MM, Utnes A, Primicerio R, Harms K, Johnsen Pj. Costs and benefits of natural transformation in Acinetobacter baylyi. BMC Microbiology. 2017;17:34:1-10en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1472626
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12866-017-0953-2
dc.identifier.issn1471-2180
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/11138
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.journalBMC Microbiology
dc.relation.projectIDeu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/FRIMEDBIO/204263/Norway/EvolutionMaintenanceAndPopulationDynamicsOfNaturalCompetenceCannibalismAndMartyrdomInBacteria//en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Basale biofag: 470::Generell mikrobiologi: 472en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Basic biosciences: 470::General microbiology: 472en_US
dc.titleCosts and benefits of natural transformation in Acinetobacter baylyien_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel