dc.contributor.author | Deraas, Trygve Sigvart | |
dc.contributor.author | Giæver, Anton | |
dc.contributor.author | Hansen, Vidje | |
dc.contributor.author | Olstad, Reidun | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-07-26T11:15:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-07-26T11:15:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-03-29 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Over the last decades there has been an increasing pressure on the acute psychiatric
wards in Norway. The major contributor to psychiatric acute admissions at the University Hospital
of North Norway in the city of Tromsø in 2001 was the GP-based Tromsø Casualty Clinic, only
open out-of-hours. We explored all acute psychiatric referrals from Tromsø Casualty Clinic in
2001. The purpose of the study was to characterize the admissions and assess the agreement
between the referring doctors and the hospital specialists according to the need for hospitalization,
agreement on application of the law and the diagnostic evaluation to assess whether the admissions
were appropriate.
Methods: Retrospective, record based, descriptive study comprising 101 psychiatric acute
referrals from the Tromsø Casualty Clinic to the psychiatric acute wards at the University Hospital
of North Norway.
Results: The specialists accepted all referrals except one, they mostly agreed upon the diagnoses
suggested by the referring doctors and they mostly confirmed the application of the law.
Seventy-five percent of the admissions took place during weekends, public holidays or nighttimes.
Diagnoses of psychoses or suicidal attempts accounted for 76 % of the total referrals. Substance
abuse was noted for 43 %, and in 22 % of all admissions the patients had stopped taking their
psychopharmacological medication. The police assisted the referring doctors in one third of all
admissions, and was the legal representative in 52 out of 59 involuntary admissions. Thirty percent
of the admissions were first- time admissions. Thirty-two percent of the hospital stays lasted for
three days or less. Median length of stay was 6.5 days.
Conclusion: The casualty clinic physicians and the hospital specialists mostly agreed in their
evaluation of patients indicating that most of the admissions were appropriate. The police was
more often involved in the involuntary admissions than intended in the law. The proportion of
patients with substance abuse was significant. Alternative treatment strategies should be developed
for non-psychotic patients in need of short-term stays. | en |
dc.format.extent | 270238 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Health Services Research 6(2006), article no 6 pp 7 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-41 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6963 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/1118 | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:no-uit_munin_936 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | |
dc.subject | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Health service and health administration research: 806 | en |
dc.subject | Helsetjenesteforskning | en |
dc.subject | Helseadministrasjonsforskning | en |
dc.title | Acute psychiatric admissions from an out-of-hours Casualty Clinic.
How do referring doctors and admitting specialists agree? | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | |