Users’ role in the making and scaling of an Information Infrastructure for Health Care based on the openEHR specification
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/11873View/ Open
Thesis (PDF)
Paper 1: Christensen, B., Ellingsen, G.: “Standardizing Clinical Pathways for Surgery Patients through ICT”. Also available in CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2013. (PDF)
Paper 4: Christensen, B., Ellingsen, G.: “Evaluating Model-Driven Development for large-scale EHRs through the openEHR approach”. Also available in Int. J. Med. Inf. 2016, 89;43–54. (PDF)
Date
2017-11-11Type
Doctoral thesisDoktorgradsavhandling
Author
Christensen, BenteAbstract
In this thesis, I discuss the socio-technical challenges in growing and information infrastructure for Health Care based on the openEHR specification, particularly focusing users’ role and contribution. Conceptualizing the emerging EPR system as the growing of an Information Infrastructure, the different happenings and activities in the development project have been interpreted as infrastructuring work on the different aspects of an emerging infrastructure. The dual level modeling approach in openEHR poses a different role and different tasks for users contributing in the development of the new EPR system. I see this as a new user domain arising, and a new user role that has been named domain-expert.
Given that decision and process support are governments’ most prominent ambitions for the next generation EPR system, this work focuses how these features will affect work, as literature describe the effect on work as a potential challenge for adoption and use of such systems. Hence, attention has been to the inertia of the installed base, work practice and the users’ efforts in describing and modelling work processes. I find that process and decision supportive features will affect multi-disciplinary work by the way workflow systems can “order” responsibility and sequential dependency of tasks. Moreover, there was a redistribution of tasks as a consequence of the formalization and the accountability mechanism.
This research is based on a study that has been ongoing for 5 years, which has allowed us to expand the focus of research longitudinally and across different social settings and scales, addressing multiple moments and sites of innovation. Methodologically, the study adheres to interpretive research and makes use of semi-structured interviews, participatory observation and document studies as methods.
Description
The papers 2, 3 and 5 of this thesis are not available in Munin.
Paper 2: Christensen, B., Silsand, L., Wynn, R., Ellingsen, G.: “The Biography of Participation". Available in Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium Papers, and Keynote Abstracts 2014, 2:71–74.
Paper 3: Christensen, B., Ellingsen, G.: “User-controlled Standardisation of Health Care Practices”. Available in ECIS 2014 Proc.
Paper 5: Christensen, B.: “Formalization and Accountability in Surgery Planning”. Available in: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work 2016, p. 293–302.
Paper 2: Christensen, B., Silsand, L., Wynn, R., Ellingsen, G.: “The Biography of Participation". Available in Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium Papers, and Keynote Abstracts 2014, 2:71–74.
Paper 3: Christensen, B., Ellingsen, G.: “User-controlled Standardisation of Health Care Practices”. Available in ECIS 2014 Proc.
Paper 5: Christensen, B.: “Formalization and Accountability in Surgery Planning”. Available in: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work 2016, p. 293–302.
Publisher
UiT The Arctic University of NorwayUiT Norges arktiske universitet
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Copyright 2017 The Author(s)
The following license file are associated with this item: