ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraaknorsk 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administrasjon/UB
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for samfunnsmedisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin)
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for samfunnsmedisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin)
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Eliciting patient preferences in shared decision-making (SDM): Comparing conversation analysis and SDM measurements

Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12531
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.018
Thumbnail
Åpne
article.pdf (281.0Kb)
Accepted manuscript version (PDF)
Dato
2017-06-18
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Forfatter
Landmark, Anne Marie Dalby; Ofstad, Eirik Hugaas; Svennevig, Jan
Sammendrag
Objective
To explore how physicians bring up patient preferences, and how it aligns with assessments of shared decision-making.

Methods
Qualitative conversation analysis of physicians formulating hypotheses about the patient’s treatment preference was compared with quantitative SDM scores on ‘patient preferences’ using OPTION(5) and MAPPIN’SDM.

Results
Physicians occasionally formulate hypotheses about patients’ preferences and then present a treatment option on the basis of that (“if you think X + we can do Y”). This practice may promote SDM in that the decisions are treated as contingent on patient preferences. However, the way these hypotheses are formulated, simultaneously constrains the patient’s freedom of choice and exerts a pressure to accept the physician’s recommendation. These opposing effects may in part explain cases where different assessment instruments yield large variations in SDM measures.

Conclusion
Eliciting patient preferences is a complex phenomenon that can be difficult to reduce into an accurate number. Detailed analysis can shed light on how patient preferences are elicited, and its consequences for patient involvement. Comparing CA and SDM measurements can contribute to specifying communicative actions that SDM scores are based on.

Practice Implications
Our findings have implications for SDM communication skills training and further development of SDM measurements.

Beskrivelse
Accepted manuscript version. Published version available in Patient Education and Counseling (2017) 100(11), s. 2081-2087.
Forlag
Elsevier
Sitering
Landmark, A.M.L., Ofstad, E.H. & Svennevig, J.S. (2017). Eliciting patient preferences in shared decision-making (SDM): Comparing conversation analysis and SDM measurements. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(11), 2081-2087.
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin) [1516]

Bla

Bla i hele MuninEnheter og samlingerForfatterlisteTittelDatoBla i denne samlingenForfatterlisteTittelDato
Logg inn

Statistikk

Antall visninger
UiT

Munin bygger på DSpace

UiT Norges Arktiske Universitet
Universitetsbiblioteket
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Tilgjengelighetserklæring