ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraaknorsk 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administrasjon/UB
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for samfunnsmedisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin)
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for samfunnsmedisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin)
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review

Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/13296
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14839
Thumbnail
Åpne
article.pdf (522.1Kb)
Accepted manuscript version (PDF)
Dato
2017-07-29
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Forfatter
Berg, Rigmor; Taraldsen, Sølvi; Said, Maryan; Sørbye, Ingvil; Vangen, Siri
Sammendrag

Background
Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) changes normal genital functionality and can cause complications. There is an increasing demand for treatment of FGM/C‐related complications.

Objectives
We conducted a systematic review of empirical quantitative research on the outcomes of interventions for women with FGM/C‐related complications.

Search strategy
A search specialist searched 16 electronic databases.

Selection criteria
Selection was performed independently by two researchers. We accepted quantitative studies that examined the outcome of an intervention for an FGM/C‐related concern.

Data collection and analysis
We extracted data into a pre‐designed form, calculated effect estimates, and performed meta‐analyses.

Main results
We included 62 studies (5829 women), which investigated the effect of defibulation, excision of cysts, and clitoral reconstruction. Meta‐analyses of defibulation versus no defibulation showed a significantly lower risk of caesarean section (relative risk, RR: 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 0.25–0.45) and perineal tears with defibulation: second‐degree tear (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24–0.79), third‐degree tear (RR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05–0.94), fourth‐degree tear (RR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01–0.41). The meta‐analyses detected no significant differences in obstetric outcomes of antenatal versus intrapartum defibulation. Except for one study, none of the studies on the excision of cysts indicated any complications, and the results were deemed favourable. Reconstructive surgery resulted in a visible clitoris in about 77% of women. Most women self‐reported improvements in their sexual life, but up to 22% experienced a worsening in sexuality‐related outcomes after reconstruction.

Conclusions
Women with FGM/C who seek therapeutic surgery should be informed about the scarcity of evidence for benefits and the potential harms of the available procedures.

Beskrivelse
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Berg, R., Taraldsen, S., Said, M., Sørbye, I. & Vangen, S. (2017). The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 125(3), 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14839, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14839. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Forlag
Wiley
Sitering
Berg, R., Taraldsen, S., Said, M., Sørbye, I. & Vangen, S. (2017). The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 125(3), 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14839
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin) [1515]

Bla

Bla i hele MuninEnheter og samlingerForfatterlisteTittelDatoBla i denne samlingenForfatterlisteTittelDato
Logg inn

Statistikk

Antall visninger
UiT

Munin bygger på DSpace

UiT Norges Arktiske Universitet
Universitetsbiblioteket
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Tilgjengelighetserklæring