Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAndreassen, Trude
dc.contributor.authorWeiderpass, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorNicula, Florian
dc.contributor.authorSuteu, Ofelia
dc.contributor.authorItu, Andreea
dc.contributor.authorBumbu, Minodora
dc.contributor.authorTincu, Aida
dc.contributor.authorUrsin, Giske
dc.contributor.authorMoen, Kåre
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T11:44:08Z
dc.date.available2018-08-24T11:44:08Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-26
dc.description.abstractRomania has Europe's highest incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. While a free national cervical cancer-screening programme has been in operation since 2012, participation in the programme is low, particularly in minority populations. The aim of this study was to explore Roma women's (non)participation in the programme from women's own perspectives and those of healthcare providers and policy makers. We carried out fieldwork for a period of 125 days in 2015/16 involving 144 study participants in Cluj and Bucharest counties. Fieldwork entailed participant observation, qualitative interviewing and focus group discussions. A striking finding was that screening providers and Roma women had highly different takes on the national screening programme. We identified four fundamental questions about which there was considerable disagreement between them: whether a free national screening programme existed in the first place, whether Roma women were meant to be included in the programme if it did, whether Roma women wanted to take part in screening, and to what degree screening participation would really benefit women's health. On the background of insights from actor-network theory, the article discusses to what degree the programme could be said to speak to the interest of its intended Roma public, and considers the controversies in light of the literature on patient centred care and user involvement in health care. The paper contributes to the understanding of the health and health-related circumstances of the largest minority in Europe. It also problematizes the use of the concept of “barriers” in research into participation in cancer screening, and exemplifies how user involvement can potentially help transform and improve screening programmes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Economic Area (EEA) Financial Mechanism 2009-2014en_US
dc.descriptionSource at <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.040> https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.040</a>.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAndreassen, T., Weiderpass, E., Nicula, F., Suteu, O., Itu, A., Bumbu, M., ... Moen, K. (2017). Controversies about cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study of Roma women's (non)participation in cervical cancer screening in Romania. Social Science and Medicine, 183, 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.040en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1489012
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.040
dc.identifier.issn0277-9536
dc.identifier.issn1873-5347
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/13592
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.journalSocial Science and Medicine
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Onkologi: 762en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Oncology: 762en_US
dc.subjectCervical canceren_US
dc.subjectCervical cancer-screeningen_US
dc.subjectRomaen_US
dc.subjectRomaniaen_US
dc.subjectParticipationen_US
dc.subjectControversiesen_US
dc.subjectInteressementen_US
dc.subjectUser involvementen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800en_US
dc.titleControversies about cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study of Roma women's (non)participation in cervical cancer screening in Romaniaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel