dc.contributor.author | Grimaldo, Eduardo | |
dc.contributor.author | Herrmann, Bent | |
dc.contributor.author | Su, Biao | |
dc.contributor.author | Føre, Heidi Moe | |
dc.contributor.author | Vollstad, Jørgen | |
dc.contributor.author | Olsen, Leonore | |
dc.contributor.author | Larsen, Roger B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tatone, Ivan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-31T08:38:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-31T08:38:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01-19 | |
dc.description.abstract | Gillnets made of a new biodegradable resin (polybutylene succinate co-adipate-co-terephthalate (PBSAT) were tested under commercial fishing conditions to compare their fishing performance with that of conventional nylon (PA) nets. The relative catch efficiency between the two gillnet 15 types was evaluated over the entire winter fishing season for cod (<i>Gadus morhua</i>) in northern Norway. The nylon gillnets caught 21% more fish (in numbers) than the biodegradable gillnets throughout the fishing season and generally showed better catch rates for most length classes, except for sizes between 82 and 90 cm. The difference in elasticity and breaking strength could explain the major difference in the size structure of fish caught by each type of gillnets, especially for larger fish. The number of times that the gillnets were deployed affected the relative catch efficiency of the gillnets with the biodegradable continuously loosing efficiency compared to the nylon. Although less catch efficient than nylon gillnets, biodegradable gillnets still show great potential for reduction of ghost fishing and plastic pollution at sea caused by this fishe | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Industrial Seafood Research Fund
Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries | en_US |
dc.description | Source at <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.01.003>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.01.003</a>. Licensed CC BY NC ND. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Grimaldo, E., Herrmann, B., Su, B., Føre, H., Vollstad, J., Olsen, L., ... Tatone, I. (2018). Comparison of fishing efficiency between biodegradable PBSAT gillnets and conventional nylon (PA) gillnets. <i>Fisheries Research, 213</i>, 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.01.003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1608181 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0165-7836 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1872-6763 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/14567 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Fisheries Research | |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/MARINFORSK/255568/Norway/Development of biodegradable materials to reduce the effect of ghost fishing in the Norwegian deep-sea gillnet fisheries// | en_US |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Fisheries technology: 924 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900::Fiskerifag: 920::Fiskeriteknologi: 924 | en_US |
dc.subject | Biodegradable gillnet | en_US |
dc.subject | PBSAT resin | en_US |
dc.subject | Gillnet fishery | en_US |
dc.subject | Ghost fishing | en_US |
dc.subject | Catch efficiency | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of fishing efficiency between biodegradable PBSAT gillnets and conventional nylon (PA) gillnets | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |