Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenriksen, André
dc.contributor.authorGrimsgaard, Sameline
dc.contributor.authorHorsch, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorHartvigsen, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorHopstock, Laila Arnesdatter
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-19T11:42:16Z
dc.date.available2019-08-19T11:42:16Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-16
dc.description.abstract<i>Background</i>: Accelerometers, often in conjunction with heart rate sensors, are extensively used to track physical activity (PA) in research. Research-grade instruments are often expensive and have limited battery capacity, limited storage, and high participant burden. Consumer-based activity trackers are equipped with similar technology and designed for long-term wear, and can therefore potentially be used in research.<p> <p><i>Objective</i>: We aimed to assess the criterion validity of the Polar M430 sport watch, compared with 2 research-grade instruments (ActiGraph and Actiheart), worn on 4 different locations using 1- and 3-axis accelerometers. <p> <p><i>Methods</i>: A total of 50 participants wore 2 ActiGraphs (wrist and hip), 2 Actihearts (upper and lower chest position), and 1 Polar M430 sport watch for 1 full day. We compared reported time (minutes) spent in sedentary behavior and in light, moderate, vigorous, and moderate to vigorous PA, step counts, activity energy expenditure, and total energy expenditure between devices. We used Pearson correlations, intraclass correlations, mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs), and Bland-Altman plots to assess criterion validity. <p> <p><i>Results</i>: Pearson correlations between the Polar M430 and all research-grade instruments were moderate or stronger for vigorous PA (<i>r</i> range .59-.76), moderate to vigorous PA (<i>r</i> range .51-.75), steps (<i>r</i> range .85-.87), total energy expenditure (<i>r</i> range .88-.94), and activity energy expenditure (<i>r</i> range .74-.79). Bland-Altman plots showed higher agreement for higher intensities of PA. MAPE was high for most outcomes. Only total energy expenditure measured by the hip-worn ActiGraph and both Actiheart positions had acceptable or close to acceptable errors with MAPEs of 6.94% (ActiGraph, 3 axes), 8.26% (ActiGraph, 1 axis), 14.54% (Actiheart, upper position), and 14.37% (Actiheart, lower position). The wrist-worn ActiGraph had a MAPE of 15.94% for measuring steps. All other outcomes had a MAPE of 22% or higher. For most outcomes, the Polar M430 was most strongly correlated with the hip-worn triaxial ActiGraph, with a moderate or strong Pearson correlation for sedentary behavior (<i>r</i>=.52) and for light (<i>r</i>=.7), moderate (<i>r</i>=.57), vigorous (<i>r</i>=.76), and moderate to vigorous (<i>r</i>=.75) PA. In addition, correlations were strong or very strong for activity energy expenditure (<i>r</i>=.75), steps (<i>r</i>=.85), and total energy expenditure (<i>r</i>=.91).<p> <p><i>Conclusions</i>: The Polar M430 can potentially be used as an addition to established research-grade instruments to collect some PA variables over a prolonged period. However, due to the high MAPE of most outcomes, only total energy expenditure can be trusted to provide close to valid results. Depending on the variable, the Polar M430 over- or underreported most metrics, and may therefore be better suited to report changes in PA over time for some outcomes, rather than as an accurate instrument for PA status in a population.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUiT, the Arctic University of Norway, the publication fund UiT, the Arctic University of Norway Troms Countyen_US
dc.descriptionSource at <a href=https://doi.org/10.2196/14438>https://doi.org/10.2196/14438. </a>en_US
dc.identifier.citationHenriksen, A., Grimsgaard, S., Horsch, A., Hartvigsen, G. & Hopstock. L. (2019). Validity of the Polar M430 Activity Monitor in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study. <i>JMIR Formative Research, 3</i>(3), e14438. https://doi.org/10.2196/14438en_US
dc.identifier.issn2561-326X
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 1712268
dc.identifier.other10.2196/14438
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/15930
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJMIR Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.journalJMIR Formative Research
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Community medicine, Social medicine: 801en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801en_US
dc.subjectactigraphyen_US
dc.subjectfitness trackersen_US
dc.subjectmotor activityen_US
dc.subjectvalidation studiesen_US
dc.titleValidity of the Polar M430 Activity Monitor in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record