Prepositional Phrase Attachment Ambiguities in German. A Cross-Dialectal Experimental Study
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/16382Dato
2018-05-15Type
Master thesisMastergradsoppgave
Forfatter
Pilsbacher, Anna KatharinaSammendrag
This thesis addresses the production and perception of sentences with ambiguous prepositional phrase attachment in Standard German. In the first part of the study, an informed native speaker produced prosodically disambiguated sentences, which were analysed acoustically for disambiguation cues. In the second part, these sentences were then presented in a perception test where respondents were asked to choose which attachment type the sentence represents. Respondents varied by membership in a dialect group (Bavarian, Alemannic or Northern).
Experimental sentence types varied by syntactic clause type. Since verb placement in German varies between simple sentences (verb-second) and embedded clauses (verb-final), variation in surface structure of the VP-phrase between simple and embedded sentences might be expected to influence disambiguation if syntactic theories of attachment preference are correct. On the other hand, prosody was also hypothesized to be an important source of disambiguation in the auditory materials presented to respondents. The materials also varied with respect to semantic bias, i.e. with respect to whether sentences gave rise to a more meaningful unit for one intended reading than for the other.
The results of the study indicated that prosody had a significant effect on attachment choice equally across all dialect groups, and that the syntactic effect of clause type was not a significant factor overall. Semantic plausibility also gave rise to no significant effects in this particular task. However, even the effect of prosody was swamped by the overwhelming preference for high attachment found for all speakers and clause types. The thesis argues that this preference is probably driven by the lexical distributional properties of the preposition mit which was the sole preposition used in the experimental materials.
Beskrivelse
[Dato for tilgjengeliggjøring endret etter epost-henvendelse fra forfatteren. 10.10.2019. LL]
Forlag
UiT Norges arktiske universitetUiT The Arctic University of Norway
Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Copyright 2018 The Author(s)
Følgende lisensfil er knyttet til denne innførselen:
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)
Relaterte innførsler
Viser innførsler relatert til tittel, forfatter og emneord.
-
Limits on P: filling in holes vs. falling in holes
Svenonius, Peter (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2003)All Germanic languages make extensive use of verb-particle combinations (known as separable-prefix verbs in the OV languages). I show some basic differences here distinguishing the Scandinavian type from the OV West Germanic languages, with English superficially patterning with Scandinavian but actually manifesting a distinct type. Specifically, I argue that the P projection is split into p and P ... -
The role of aktionsart in deverbal nouns: State nominalizations across languages
Fábregas, Antonio; Marín, Rafael (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2012)Most of the literature devoted to the study of deverbal nominalizations concentrates on the complex event reading (La concentración de partículas tiene lugar a temperatura ambiente, ‘The concentration of particles takes place at room temperature’) and the object reading (El paciente tenía concentraciones de calcio en el hombro, ‘The patient had calcium concentrations in the shoulder’), while ... -
Directionality and Resultativity : The Cross-Linguistic Correlation Revisited
Son, Minjeong (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel, 2007)Recent approaches to the cross-linguistic variation in the expressions of directed motion assume a tight correlation between adjectival resultative and directed motion constructions (e.g., Beck and Snyder 2001, Mateu and Rigau 2001; 2002, McIntyre 2004, Beavers et al. 2004). Beck and Snyder (2001), in particular, argue that languages that allow adjectival resultatives also allow directed motion ...