ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Universitetsbiblioteket
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (UB)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Universitetsbiblioteket
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (UB)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Predictors of family focused practice: organisation, profession, or the role as child responsible personnel?

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17083
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4553-8
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (645.3Kb)
Published version (PDF)
Date
2019-11-05
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Skogøy, Bjørg Eva; Ogden, Terje; Weimand, Bente; Ruud, Torleif; Sørgaard, Knut W.; Maybery, Darryl
Abstract

Background - Health professionals in Norway are required by law to help safeguard information and follow-up with children of parents with mental or physical illness, or who have substance abuse problems, to reduce their higher risk of psychosocial problems. Knowledge is lacking regarding whether organisation and/or worker-related factors can explain the differences in health professionals’ ability to support the families when patients are parents.

Methods - Employing a translated, generic version of the Family Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire (FFPQ), this cross-sectional study examines family focused practice (FFP) differences in relation to health professionals’ background and role (N = 280) along with exploring predictors of parent, child, and family support.

Results - While most health professions had begun to have conversations with parents on children’s needs, under one-third have had conversations with children. There were significant differences between nurses, social workers, psychologists, physicians, and others on seven of the FFP subscales, with physicians scoring lowest on five subscales and psychologists providing the least family support. Controlling for confounders, there were significant differences between child responsible personnel (CRP) and other clinicians (C), with CRP scoring significantly higher on knowledge and skills, confidence, and referrals. Predictors of FFP varied between less complex practices (talking with parents) and more complex practices (family support and referrals).

Conclusion - The type of profession was a key predictor of delivering family support, suggesting that social workers have more undergraduate training to support families, followed by nurses; alternately, the results could suggest that that social workers and nurses have been more willing or able than physicians and psychologists to follow the new legal requirements. The findings highlight the importance of multidisciplinary teams and of tailoring training strategies to health professionals’ needs in order to strengthen their ability to better support children and families when a parent is ill.

Is part of
Skogøy, B.E. (2019). From policy to practice: Implementation of changes in law to support and protect children of ill parents. (Doctoral thesis). https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17328.
Publisher
Springer Nature
Citation
Skogøy BE, Ogden T, Weimand BM, Ruud T, Sørgaard KSO, Maybery D. Predictors of family focused practice: organisation, profession, or the role as child responsible personnel?. BMC Health Services Research. 2019;19:793:1-13
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (UB) [3244]
Copyright 2019 The Author(s)

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)