Institutionalization, neo-politicization and the politics of defining Sámi research
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17980Dato
2019-05-02Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Forfatter
Junka-Aikio, Laura OrvokkiSammendrag
This article critically examines recent changes in the social terrain of Sámi research in Finland, where the research field is subject to a new wave of academic institutionalization, and where questions regarding “Sáminess” have become particularly prominent. The article argues that in this conjuncture of institutionalization and neo-politicization, definitions of Sámi research which emphasize its political and ethical qualities (“Sámi research” as research done from a “Sámi perspective” or “taking it into account”) appear increasingly problematic and can actually end up doing the opposite of what was originally intended. Instead of bringing questions regarding the politics of perspective, location, representation and power/knowledge to the fore, presenting the research field in these terms might turn attention away from a variety of interests and political desires that currently are projected onto Sámi research, and hence depoliticize understandings of Sámi research and its complex interdependence with the state and society.
Beskrivelse
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Acta Borealia on 02 May 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/https://doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2019.1607074.
Forlag
Taylor & FrancisSitering
Junka-Aikio LO. Institutionalization, neo-politicization and the politics of defining Sámi research. Acta Borealia. 2019;36(1):1-22Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group