Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMuller, Ashley Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorOrmstad, Sari Susanna
dc.contributor.authorJardim, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Trine Bjerke
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Rigmor
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-10T10:23:57Z
dc.date.available2020-07-10T10:23:57Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.description.abstractRemote patient monitoring (RPM) allows for the real-time transmission of health data, evaluation of this data, and appropriate follow-up. This allows providers to monitor the health status of chronically ill patients and quickly adjust treatment regimes, without requiring that patients continually visit providers’ offices.<p><p> We summarized systematic reviews of a specific type of RPM that the Norwegian Directorate of Health is most interested in: RPM that is occurring in primary health services, in which provider feedback is included, and not including technologies based on internet, mobile, or tablet applications.<p><p> We included 11 randomized controlled trials of patients with diabetes and/or hypertension, from four systematic reviews. Patients were on average in their 50s, 60s, or 70s, and roughly one to two of every 20 patients had at least one additional multi-morbidity.<p><p> Based on summaries of each outcome and our assessment of the certainty of the evidence, we have drawn the following conclusions: <p> <ul id = «mylist»> <li></li> RPM probably makes little to no difference on HbA1c in dia-betic patients (types I and II) and on systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients. <li></li> RPM probably has a small negative effect on the physical component of health-related quality of life. <li></li> RPM may make little to no difference to diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol, number of patients needing hospitalizations or emergency stays, and the mental health component of health-related quality of life. </ul><p><p> The specific type of RPM we examined in this review does not appear commonly implemented among people with chronic conditions other than diabetes or hypertension. Evidence of its clinical and health care utilization effectiveness is weak.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMuller AE, Ormstad SS, Jardim P, Johansen TB, Berg RC. Managing chronic illnesses with remote patient monitoring in primary health care. Folkehelseinstituttet; 2020. 94 p.en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1805835
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-8406-062-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/18802
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNorwegian Institute of Public Healthen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.fhi.no/publ/2020/oppfolging-av-kroniske-sykdommer-med-medisinsk-avstandsoppfolging-i-primarh/
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 Norwegian Institute of Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US
dc.titleManaging chronic illnesses with remote patient monitoring in primary health careen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeResearch reporten_US
dc.typeForskningsrapporten_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record