ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for klinisk odontologi
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk odontologi)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for klinisk odontologi
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk odontologi)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Piezoelectric bone surgery for implant site preparation compared with conventional drilling techniques: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/19296
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (341.1Kb)
Published version (PDF)
Date
2020-05-18
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Stacchi, Claudio; Bassi, Francesco; Troiano, Giuseppe; Rapani, Antonio; Lombardi, Teresa; Jokstad, Asbjørn; Sennerby, Lars; Schierano, Gianmario
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether the use of piezoelectric bone surgery (PBS) for implant site preparation reduces surgical time, improves implant stability, preserves marginal bone level and improves the survival rate of oral implants compared with conventional drilling techniques.

Materials and methods: This meta-analysis followed the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO (international prospective register of systematic reviews) database (CRD42019142749). The PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Open Grey databases were screened for articles published from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2018. The selection criteria included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and case-control studies (CCTs) comparing the PBS with conventional rotary instruments for implant site preparation, and reporting any of the selected clinical outcomes (surgical time, implant stability, marginal bone variations and implant failure rate) for both groups. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for CCTs. A meta-analysis was performed, and the power of the meta-analytic findings was assessed by trial sequential analysis (TSA).

Results: Eight RCTs and one CCT met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The meta-analysis and the TSA showed moderate evidence suggesting that the PBS prolongs surgery duration and improves secondary stability 12 weeks after implant placement compared with conventional drilling techniques. Insufficient data are available in literature to assess if the PBS reduces marginal bone loss and/or improves the implant survival rate compared with conventional drilling techniques.

Conclusions: Adequately powered randomised clinical trials are needed to confirm the PBS positive effect on the secondary stability and to draw conclusions about the influence of PBS on marginal bone stability and implant survival.

Description
Source at https://ijoi.quintessenz.de/index.php?jid=ejoi&doc=abstract&abstractID=44569.
Publisher
Quintessence
Citation
Stacchi, Bassi F, Troiano, Rapani, Lombardi, Jokstad A, Sennerby, Schierano. Piezoelectric bone surgery for implant site preparation compared with conventional drilling techniques: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. . European Journal of Oral Implantology. 2020;13(2):141-158
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk odontologi) [160]
Copyright 2020 Quintessenz Verlags- GmbH

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)