Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKienlin, Simone Maria
dc.contributor.authorNytrøen, Kari
dc.contributor.authorStacey, Dawn
dc.contributor.authorKasper, Jürgen
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T13:34:44Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T13:34:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-01
dc.description.abstract<i>Introduction</i> - While shared decision‐making (SDM) training programmes for health professionals have been developed in several countries, few have been evaluated. In Norway, a comprehensive curriculum, “klar for samvalg” (ready for SDM), for interprofessional health‐care teams was created using generic didactic methods and guidance to tailor training to various contexts. The programmes adapted didactic methods from an evidence‐based German training programmes (doktormitSDM). The overall aim was to evaluate two particular SDM modules on facilitating SDM implementation into clinical practice.<p> <p><i>Method</i> - A descriptive mixed methods study using questionnaires and a focus group guided by the Medical Research Council Complex Interventions Framework. The training was provided as two different applications (module AB [introduction and SDM‐basics] and module ABC [introduction, SDM‐basics and interactive training]) with differing learning objectives, extent of interactivity, and duration (1 vs 2 hours).<p> <p>Groups of participants were recruited consecutively based on requests for health professional SDM training in university/college‐ and hospital‐settings. By a focus group and a self‐administered questionnaire comprehensibility, relevance and acceptance were assessed and qualitative feedback collected after the training. Data passed descriptive and content analysis, respectively. Knowledge was assessed twice using five multiple‐choice items and analysed using paired t‐tests.<p> <p><i>Results</i> - In 11 (six AB and five ABC) training sessions, 357/429 (296 AB and 133 ABC) eligible nurses, physicians and health professional students with varying clinical backgrounds and previous levels of SDM‐knowledge participated. SDM‐knowledge increased from 25‐78% (range pretest) to 85‐95% (range post‐test) (<i>P</i> ≤ .001).<p> <p>The training was rated easy to understand, acceptable and relevant for practice. Findings to improve the education suggest higher emphasis on interprofessional teaching methods.<p> <p><i>Conclusions</i> - The two SDM training modules met the basic requirements for use in a broader SDM implementation strategy and can even improve knowledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKienlin SM, Nytrøen K, Stacey D, Kasper J. Ready for shared decision making: Pretesting a training module for health professionals on sharing decisions with their patients. Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice. 2020;26(2):610-621en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1812295
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jep.13380
dc.identifier.issn1356-1294
dc.identifier.issn1365-2753
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/19892
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800en_US
dc.titleReady for shared decision making: Pretesting a training module for health professionals on sharing decisions with their patientsen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record