Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKjærvik, Cato
dc.contributor.authorStensland, Eva
dc.contributor.authorByhring, Hanne Sigrun
dc.contributor.authorGjertsen, Jan-Erik
dc.contributor.authorDybvik, Eva
dc.contributor.authorSøreide, Odd
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-23T13:33:22Z
dc.date.available2020-12-23T13:33:22Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-14
dc.description.abstract<i>Aims</i> - The aim of this study was to describe variation in hip fracture treatment in Norway expressed as adherence to international and national evidence-based treatment guidelines, to study factors influencing deviation from guidelines, and to analyze consequences of non-adherence.<p> <p><i>Methods</i> - International and national guidelines were identified and treatment recommendations extracted. All 43 hospitals routinely treating hip fractures in Norway were characterized. From the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR), hip fracture patients aged > 65 years and operated in the period January 2014 to December 2018 for fractures with conclusive treatment guidelines were included (n = 29,613: femoral neck fractures (n = 21,325), stable trochanteric fractures (n = 5,546), inter- and subtrochanteric fractures (n = 2,742)). Adherence to treatment recommendations and a composite indicator of best practice were analyzed. Patient survival and reoperations were evaluated for each recommendation.<p> <p><i>Results</i> - Median age of the patients was 84 (IQR 77 to 89) years and 69% (20,427/29,613) were women. Overall, 79% (23,390/29,613) were treated within 48 hours, and 80% (23,635/29,613) by a surgeon with more than three years’ experience. Adherence to guidelines varied substantially but was markedly better in 2018 than in 2014. Having a dedicated hip fracture unit (OR 1.06, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.11) and a hospital hip fracture programme (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.27) increased the probability of treatment according to best practice. Surgery after 48 hours increased one-year mortality significantly (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.22; p = 0.001). Alternative treatment to arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) increased mortality after 30 days (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.62)) and one year (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.72), and also increased the number of reoperations (OR 4.61, 95% CI 3.73 to 5.71). An uncemented stem increased the risk of reoperation significantly (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.48; p = 0.030).<p> <p><i>Conclusion</i> - Our study demonstrates a substantial variation between hospitals in adherence to evidence-based guidelines for treatment of hip fractures in Norway. Non-adherence can be ascribed to in-hospital factors. Poor adherence has significant negative consequences for patients in the form of increased mortality rates at 30 and 365 days post-treatment and in reoperation rates.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGjertsen, Stensland, Byhring, Dybvik, Søreide, Kjærvik. Hip fracture treatment in Norway deviation from evidence-based treatment guidelines: data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, 2014 to 2018. Bone & Joint Open. 2020;1(10):644-653en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1859804
dc.identifier.doi10.1302/2633-1462.110.BJO-2020-0124.R1
dc.identifier.issn2633-1462
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/20141
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBritish Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKjærvik, C. (2022). Hip fractures in Norway – Inequity in treatment and outcomes. (Doctoral thesis). <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27134>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27134</a>.
dc.relation.journalBone & Joint Open
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Basic medical, dental and veterinary science disciplines: 710en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Basale medisinske, odontologiske og veterinærmedisinske fag: 710en_US
dc.titleHip fracture treatment in Norway deviation from evidence-based treatment guidelines: data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, 2014 to 2018en_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel