dc.contributor.author | Vonen, Barthold | |
dc.contributor.author | Augestad, Knut Magne | |
dc.contributor.author | Aspevik, Ranveig | |
dc.contributor.author | Norum, Jan | |
dc.contributor.author | Nestvold, Torunn | |
dc.contributor.author | Lindsetmo, Rolv-Ole | |
dc.contributor.author | Ringberg, Unni | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnsen, Roar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-30T12:34:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-30T12:34:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-06-25 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: All patients who undergo surgery for colon cancer are followed up according to the
guidelines of the Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (NGICG). These guidelines state that
the aims of follow-up after surgery are to perform quality assessment, provide support and improve
survival. In Norway, most of these patients are followed up in a hospital setting. We describe a
multi-centre randomized controlled trial to test whether these patients can be followed up by their
general practitioner (GP) without altering quality of life, cost effectiveness and/or the incidence of
serious clinical events.
<br>
Methods and Design: Patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer with histological grade
Dukes's Stage A, B or C and below 75 years of age are eligible for inclusion. They will be
randomized after surgery to follow-up at the surgical outpatient clinic (control group) or followup
by the district GP (intervention group). Both study arms comply with the national NGICG
guidelines. The primary endpoints will be quality of life (QoL) (measured by the EORTC QLQ C-
30 and the EQ-5D instruments), serious clinical events (SCEs), and costs. The follow-up period will
be two years after surgery, and quality of life will be measured every three months. SCEs and costs
will be estimated prospectively. The sample size was 170 patients.
<br>
Discussion: There is an ongoing debate on the best method of follow-up for patients with CRC.
Due to a wide range of follow-up programmes and paucity of randomized trials, it is impossible to
draw conclusions about the best combination and frequency of clinic (or family practice) visits,
blood tests, endoscopic procedures and radiological examinations that maximize the clinical outcome, quality of life and costs. Most studies on follow-up of CRC patients have been performed
in a hospital outpatient setting. We hypothesize that postoperative follow-up of colon cancer
patients (according to national guidelines) by GPs will not have any impact on patients' quality of
life. Furthermore, we hypothesize that there will be no increase in SCEs and that the incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio will improve.
<br>
Trial registration: This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration
number is: NCT00572143 | en |
dc.description | This article is part of Knut Magne Augestad's PhD thesis, which is available in Munin at <a href=http://hdl.handle.net/10037/5167>http://hdl.handle.net/10037/5167</a> | en |
dc.format.extent | 294150 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Health Services Research 2008, 8:137 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/2145 | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:no-uit_munin_1896 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | |
dc.subject | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::General surgery: 780 | en |
dc.title | Should the surgeon or the general practitioner (GP) follow up
patients after surgery for colon cancer? A randomized controlled
trial protocol focusing on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and
serious clinical events | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en |