dc.contributor.author | Johansen, Lars Thomas | |
dc.contributor.author | Braut, Geir Sverre | |
dc.contributor.author | Acharya, Ganesh | |
dc.contributor.author | Andresen, Jan Fredrik | |
dc.contributor.author | Øian, Pål | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-23T08:57:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-23T08:57:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09-08 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background - The Norwegian Board of Health Supervision aims to contribute to the improvement of quality and patient safety in the healthcare services. Planned audits were performed to investigate how 12 selected Norwegian obstetric units reported and analyzed adverse events as the part of their quality assurance and patient safety work.<p>
Methods - Serious adverse events coded as birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and severe postpartum hemorrhage that occurred during 2014 (the most recent year for which the quality assured data were available) were obtained from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. The obstetric units were asked to submit medical records, internal adverse events reports, and their internal guidelines outlining which events should be reported to the quality assurance system. We identified the adverse events at each obstetric unit that were reported internally and/or to the central authorities. Two obstetricians carried out an evaluation of each event reported.<p>
Results - Five hundred fifty-three serious adverse events were registered among 17,323 births that took place at the selected units. Twenty-one events were excluded because of incorrect coding or missing information. Eight events were registered in more than one category, and these were distributed to the category directly related to injury or adverse outcome. Nine of twelve (75 %) obstetric units had written guidelines describing which events should be reported. The obstetric units reported 49 of 524 (9.3 %) serious adverse events in their internal quality assurance system and 39 (7.4 %) to central authorities. Of the very serious adverse events, 29 of 149 (19.4 %) were reported. Twenty-three of 49 (47 %) reports did not contain relevant assessments or proposals for improving quality and patient safety.<p>
Conclusions - This study showed that adverse event reporting and analyses by Norwegian obstetric units, as a part of quality assurance and patient safety work, are suboptimal. The reporting culture and compliance with guidelines need to be improved substantially for better safety in patient care, risk mitigation and clinical quality assurance. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Johansen, Braut, Acharya, Andresen, Øian. Adverse events reporting by obstetric units in Norway as part of their quality assurance and patient safety work: an analysis of practice. BMC Health Services Research. 2021;21(1):1-8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1935740 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12913-021-06956-6 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6963 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/22635 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | BMC | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | BMC Health Services Research | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2021 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Basic medical, dental and veterinary science disciplines: 710 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Basale medisinske, odontologiske og veterinærmedisinske fag: 710 | en_US |
dc.title | Adverse events reporting by obstetric units in Norway as part of their quality assurance and patient safety work: an analysis of practice | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |