Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChudal, Roshan
dc.contributor.authorTiiri, Elina
dc.contributor.authorBrunstein Klomek, Anat
dc.contributor.authorSay How, Ong
dc.contributor.authorFossum, Sturla
dc.contributor.authorKaneko, Hitoshi
dc.contributor.authorKolaitis, Gerasimos
dc.contributor.authorLesinskiene, Sigita
dc.contributor.authorLi, Liping
dc.contributor.authorNguyen Huong, Mai
dc.contributor.authorKumar Praharaj, Samir
dc.contributor.authorSillanmaki, Lauri
dc.contributor.authorSlobodskaya, Helena
dc.contributor.authorSrabstein, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorWiguna, Thjin
dc.contributor.authorZamani, Zahra
dc.contributor.authorSourander, Andre
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-28T07:37:18Z
dc.date.available2021-09-28T07:37:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-21
dc.description.abstractThere has been a lack of studies on bullying in non-western low-income and middle-income countries. This study reported the prevalence of traditional victimization, cybervictimization, and the combination of these, in 13 European and Asian countries, and explored how psychiatric symptoms were associated with victimization. The data for this cross-sectional, school-based study of 21,688 adolescents aged 13–15 were collected from 2011 to 2017. The main outcomes were traditional and cybervictimization obtained from student self-reports. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire was used to assess psychiatric symptoms. Generalized estimating equation and logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The mean prevalence of any victimization was 28.9%, of traditional victimization only, this was 17.7%, and for cybervictimization only this was 5.1%. Cybervictimization occurred both independently, and in combination with, traditional victimization. The mean prevalence of combined victimization was 6.1%. The mean proportion of those who were cyberbullied only among those who were either cyberbullied only or bullied both traditionally and in cyber was 45.1%. The rates of prevalence varied widely between countries. In the total sample, those who experienced combined victimization, reported the highest internalizing symptoms (girls, OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.22–1.29; boys, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.25–1.33). The study findings suggest that anti-bullying interventions should include mental health components and target both traditional and cyberbullying. Due to the overlap between these, targeting bullying should primarily focus on how to reduce bullying behavior rather than just focusing on where bullying takes place.en_US
dc.identifier.citationChudal, Tiiri, Brunstein Klomek A, Say How, Fossum S, Kaneko H, Kolaitis G, Lesinskiene S, Li L, Nguyen Huong, Kumar Praharaj, Sillanmaki L, Slobodskaya H, Srabstein, Wiguna T, Zamani, Sourander A. Victimization by traditional bullying and cyberbullying and the combination of these among adolescents in 13 European and Asian countries. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2021en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1931409
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01779-6
dc.identifier.issn1018-8827
dc.identifier.issn1435-165X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/22676
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US
dc.titleVictimization by traditional bullying and cyberbullying and the combination of these among adolescents in 13 European and Asian countriesen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel