dc.contributor.author | Sahakyan, Mushegh A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Verbeke, Caroline S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tholfsen, Tore | |
dc.contributor.author | Ignjatovic, Dejan | |
dc.contributor.author | Kleive, Dyre | |
dc.contributor.author | Buanes, Trond | |
dc.contributor.author | Lassen, Kristoffer | |
dc.contributor.author | Røsok, Bård I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Labori, Knut Jørgen | |
dc.contributor.author | Edwin, Bjørn | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-10T12:43:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-10T12:43:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-07-22 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background. Resection margin status is considered one of
the few surgeon-controlled parameters affecting prognosis
in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While
studies mostly focus on resection margins in pancreatoduodenectomy, little is known about their role in distal
pancreatectomy (DP). This study aimed to investigate
resection margins in DP for PDAC.<p>
<p>Methods. Patients who underwent DP for PDAC between
October 2004 and February 2020 were included (n = 124).
Resection margins and associated parameters were studied
in two consecutive time periods during which different
pathology examination protocols were used: non-standardized (period 1: 2004–2014) and standardized (period 2:
2015–2020). Microscopic margin involvement (R1) was
defined as B1 mm clearance.<p>
<p>Results. Laparoscopic and open resections were performed in 117 (94.4%) and 7 (5.6%) patients, respectively.
The R1 rate for the entire cohort was 73.4%, increasing
from 60.4% in period 1 to 83.1% in period 2 (p = 0.005).
A significantly higher R1 rate was observed for the posterior margin (35.8 vs. 70.4%, p\0.001) and anterior
pancreatic surface (based on a 0 mm clearance; 18.9 vs.
35.4%, p = 0.045). Pathology examination period, poorly
differentiated PDAC, and vascular invasion were associated with R1 in the multivariable model. Extended DP,
positive anterior pancreatic surface, lymph node ratio,
perineural invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy, but not
R1, were significant prognostic factors for overall survival
in the entire cohort.<p>
<p>Conclusions. Pathology examination is a key determinant
of resection margin status following DP for PDAC. A high
R1 rate is to be expected when pathology examination is
meticulous and standardized. Involvement of the anterior
pancreatic surface affects prognosis. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Sahakyan, Verbeke, Tholfsen, Ignjatovic, Kleive, Buanes, Lassen, Røsok, Labori, Edwin. Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2021:1-10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1928205 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1245/s10434-021-10464-6 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1068-9265 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1534-4681 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/23650 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Annals of Surgical Oncology | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2021 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.title | Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |