Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMas-Carrió, Eduard
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Judith
dc.contributor.authorNasanbat, Battogtokh
dc.contributor.authorRavchig, Samiya
dc.contributor.authorBuxton, Mmabaledi
dc.contributor.authorNyamukondiwa, Casper
dc.contributor.authorStoffel, Céline
dc.contributor.authorAugugliaro, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorCeacero, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorTaberlet, Pierre Robert Michel
dc.contributor.authorGlaizot, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorChriste, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorFumagalli, Luca
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-21T10:18:03Z
dc.date.available2022-02-21T10:18:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-29
dc.description.abstractBiodiversity assessments are indispensable tools for planning and monitoring conservation strategies. Camera traps (CT) are widely used to monitor wildlife and have proven their usefulness. Environmental DNA (eDNA)-based approaches are increasingly implemented for biomonitoring, combining sensitivity, high taxonomic coverage and resolution, non-invasiveness and easiness of sampling, but remain challenging for terrestrial fauna. However, in remote desert areas where scattered water bodies attract terrestrial species, which release their DNA into the water, this method presents a unique opportunity for their detection. In order to identify the most efficient method for a given study system, comparative studies are needed. Here, we compare CT and DNA metabarcoding of water samples collected from two desert ecosystems, the Trans-Altai Gobi in Mongolia and the Kalahari in Botswana. We recorded with CT the visiting patterns of wildlife and studied the correlation with the biodiversity captured with the eDNA approach. The aim of the present study was threefold: (a) to investigate how well waterborne eDNA captures signals of terrestrial fauna in remote desert environments, which have been so far neglected in terms of biomonitoring efforts; (b) to compare two distinct approaches for biomonitoring in such environments; and (c) to draw recommendations for future eDNA-based biomonitoring. We found significant correlations between the two methodologies and describe a detectability score based on variables extracted from CT data and the visiting patterns of wildlife. This supports the use of eDNA-based biomonitoring in these ecosystems and encourages further research to integrate the methodology in the planning and monitoring of conservation strategies.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMas-Carrió, Schneider, Nasanbat, Ravchig, Buxton, Nyamukondiwa, Stoffel, Augugliaro, Ceacero, Taberlet, Glaizot, Christe, Fumagalli. Assessing environmental DNA metabarcoding and camera trap surveys as complementary tools for biomonitoring of remote desert water bodies. Environmental DNA. 2021:1-16en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1996793
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/edn3.274
dc.identifier.issn2637-4943
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/24097
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental DNA
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.titleAssessing environmental DNA metabarcoding and camera trap surveys as complementary tools for biomonitoring of remote desert water bodiesen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel