Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDianatinasab, Mostafa
dc.contributor.authorWesselius, Anke
dc.contributor.authorde Loeij, Tessa
dc.contributor.authorSalehi-Abargouei, Amin
dc.contributor.authorYu, Evan Y. W.
dc.contributor.authorFararouei, Mohammad
dc.contributor.authorBrinkman, Maree
dc.contributor.authorvan den Brandt, Piet
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Emily
dc.contributor.authorWeiderpass, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorLe Calvez-Kelm, Florence
dc.contributor.authorGunter, Marc J.
dc.contributor.authorHuybrechts, Inge
dc.contributor.authorLiedberg, Fredrik
dc.contributor.authorSkeie, Guri
dc.contributor.authorTjonneland, Anne
dc.contributor.authorRiboli, Elio
dc.contributor.authorZeegers, Maurice P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-24T13:39:25Z
dc.date.available2022-02-24T13:39:25Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-25
dc.description.abstractEvidence on the effects of meat consumption from different sources on the risk of bladder cancer (BC) is limited and controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the associations between meat consumption and BC risk using a pooled data approach. Individual data from 11 prospective cohorts comprising 2848 BC cases and 515,697 non-cases with a total of 5,498,025 person-years of follow-up was pooled and analysed to investigate the potential associations between total red meat and products, red meat, processed meat, poultry and total fish and BC risk. Hazard ratios (HRs), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were estimated using Cox regression models stratified on cohort. Overall, an increased BC risk was found for high intake of organ meat (HR comparing highest with lowest tertile: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.36, p-trend = 0.03). On the contrary, a marginally inverse association was observed for total fish intake and BC risk among men (HR comparing highest with lowest tertile: 0.79, 95% CI 0.65, 0.97, p-trend = 0.04). No associations were observed for other meat sources. Results of this prospective study suggest that organ meat consumption may be associated with BC development. Replication in large-scale prospective studies and investigation of possible causal mechanisms is needed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDianatinasab, Wesselius, de Loeij, Salehi-Abargouei, Yu, Fararouei, Brinkman, van den Brandt, White, Weiderpass, Le Calvez-Kelm, Gunter, Huybrechts, Liedberg, Skeie, Tjonneland, Riboli, Zeegers. The association between meat and fish consumption and bladder cancer risk: a pooled analysis of 11 cohort studies. European Journal of Epidemiology (EJE). 2021;36(8):781-792en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1998023
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10654-021-00762-4
dc.identifier.issn0393-2990
dc.identifier.issn1573-7284
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/24140
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Epidemiology (EJE)
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7-PEOPLE/618308/Norway/Nutrition and Bladder Cancer/BLADDER CANCER EPID/en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.titleThe association between meat and fish consumption and bladder cancer risk: a pooled analysis of 11 cohort studiesen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel