Historical foundations and contemporary expressions of a right to health care in Circumpolar Indigenous contexts: A cross-national analysis
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/24286Date
2021-07-14Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Author
Lavoie, Josée G.; Stoor, Jon Petter; Rink, Elizabeth; Cueva, Katie; Gladun, Elena; Larsen, Christina Viskum Lytken; Akearok, Gwen Healey; Kanayurak, NicoleAbstract
Although numerous comparative Indigenous health policy analyses exist in the literature, to date, little
attention has been paid to comparative analyses of Circumpolar health policy and the impact these policies
may have on Indigenous peoples’ rights to health. In this article, we ground our discussion of Indigenous
peoples’ right to access culturally appropriate and responsive health care within the context of the United
Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Under UNDRIP, signatory states are
obligated to guarantee that Indigenous peoples have access to the same services accessible to all citizens
without discrimination. Signatory states must also guarantee access to services that are grounded in
Indigenous cultures, medicines, and practices and must address Indigenous peoples’ determinants of health
at least to the same extent as their national counterparts. Our analysis finds that the implementation of this
declaration varies across the Circumpolar north.The United States recognizes an obligation to provide health
care for American Indian and Alaska Native people in exchange for the land that was taken from them. Other
countries provide Indigenous citizens access to care in the same health care systems as other citizens.
Intercultural models of care exist in Alaska and to some extent across the Canadian territories. However,
aside from Sa´ mi Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Mental Health and Substance Use in northern Norway,
intercultural models are absent in Nordic countries and in Greenland. While Russia has not ratified UNDRIP,
Russian policy guarantees access to health care to all citizens, although access is particularly limited in rural
and remote environments, including the Russian Arctic. We conclude that Circumpolar nations should begin
and/or expand commitments to culturally appropriate, self-determined, access to health care in Circumpolar
contexts to reduce health inequities and adhere to obligations outlined in UNDRIP.
Publisher
University of California PressCitation
Lavoie, Stoor, Rink, Cueva, Gladun, Larsen, Akearok, Kanayurak. Historical foundations and contemporary expressions of a right to health care in Circumpolar Indigenous contexts: A cross-national analysis. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 2021;9(1)Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Copyright 2021 The Author(s)