dc.contributor.author | Benevenuto, Rafael Fonseca | |
dc.contributor.author | Venter, Hermoine Jean | |
dc.contributor.author | Zanatta, Caroline Bedin | |
dc.contributor.author | Nodari, Rubens Onofre | |
dc.contributor.author | Agapito-Tenfen, Sarah Zanon | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-31T07:35:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-31T07:35:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-01-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: International agreements and domestic legislation regulate genetically modified (GM) crops for
environmental release, recognizing that genetic engineering could result in unintended genotypic and phenotypic effects. In that context, omics technologies, which allow comprehensive characterization of the molecular
profile of GM crops at all levels, may be used to assess alterations or effects of genetic engineering.<p>
<p>Objective: To determine whether omics techniques are suitable tools to comprehensively screen for metabolic
changes due to genetic modification in plants.
<p>Approaches: A literature search was conducted in four online scientific databases for relevant publications. After
removal of duplicates, we retained only studies that included cry, epsps and pat/bar transgenes. We evaluated the
full texts of the remaining papers and performed data extraction. We placed the extracted outcomes into an
evidence table, which comprised six major categories, including an analysis of altered metabolic pathways based
on the KEGG pathway database.
<p>Main findings: Sixty articles were included in this review. We found a high proportion of publicly funded studies
(86.7%) compared to just three with industry financial support. We found that 40% of the plant material
analyzed was produced in the field, 26.7% in growth chambers, and 18.3% in greenhouse experiments, although
this information could not be extracted from all studies. More than one third (38.4%) of the studies did not use a
non-GM near-isogenic line as a comparator, and half did not specify the number of plants used per sample in their
reports. All the studies (except three that did not perform a comparative analysis) reported statistical differences
in GM versus non-GM omic profiles. A heatmap analysis showed that the most frequently affected metabolic
pathways were related to metabolism of carbohydrates, energy, lipids, and amino acids, as well as genetic information processing and environmental information processing.
<p>Conclusion: This review shows that omics techniques can profile different levels of genetic information and
metabolism and can be useful tools in assessing alterations in genetically modified plants. In recent years, there
have been intensive efforts to harmonize omics methods. Consistent guidelines with standardized frameworks are
needed to capitalize on the unquestionable potential of implementing untargeted omics analyses in the risk
assessment process. Finally, there is a need to build an assessment framework connecting omics results to biologically relevant changes in the GM organism, and this framework to be operable for the risk assessment
process. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Benevenuto, Venter, Zanatta CB, Nodari, Agapito-Tenfen SZ. Alterations in genetically modified crops assessed by omics studies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2022;120:325-337 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2020210 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.01.002 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0924-2244 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1879-3053 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26486 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Trends in Food Science & Technology | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2022 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.title | Alterations in genetically modified crops assessed by omics studies: Systematic review and meta-analysis | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |