ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for klinisk medisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for klinisk medisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

External Validation of a Prognostic Score for Patients with Brain Metastases: Extended Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000506954
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (320.1Kb)
Accepted manuscript version (PDF)
Date
2020-03-26
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Nieder, Carsten; Hess, Sebastian; Lewitzki, Victor
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of our study was the external validation of an extended variant of the four-tiered diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA) that includes more information about extracranial disease burden and blood test results, and predicts survival of patients with brain metastases. The extracranial DS-GPA (EC-GPA) includes serum albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, and number of extracranial organs involved. Originally, the score was developed in Germany. Patients and

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 236 patients with brain metastases treated with primary whole-brain radiotherapy in North-Norway was performed (independent external validation cohort).

Results: The fourtiered EC-GPA score showed good discrimination between all prognostic groups (log-rank test p < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). One-year survival was 0, 11, 30, and 100%, respectively. Median survival was 0.7 months (95% CI, 0.5–0.9) in the worst prognostic group, with a hazard ratio for death of 44.31 (95% CI, 5.78–339.50) compared to the best group. In the German database, the corresponding HR was 31.64 (median survival 0.4 months). The remaining hazard ratios in this validation study were 7.13 and 12.10, compared with 4.84 and 9.26 in the score development study.

Conclusions: This study provides an independent validation of the ECGPA, which was the best prognostic model for defining patients who did not benefit from radiation therapy of brain metastases in terms of overall survival in the original German study. The proposed modification of the established DS-GPA should undergo further validation in multi-institutional databases.

Description
This is the accepted manuscript version of an article published by Karger Publishers in [Oncology Research and Treatment/2020/43/5/221–226 DOI: 10.1159/000506954 and available on https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/506954
Publisher
Karger
Citation
Nieder, Hess, Lewitzki. External Validation of a Prognostic Score for Patients with Brain Metastases: Extended Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment. Oncology Research and Treatment. 2020;43(5):221-226
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin) [1974]
Copyright 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)