On trade-offs in bilingualism and moving beyond the stacking the deck fallacy
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27803Date
2022-12-05Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Abstract
Despite a meteoric rise, results in the cognitive science of bilingualism present with significant inconsistency. In parallel, there is a striking absence of an ecologically valid theory within bilingualism research. How should one interpret the totality of available data that can pull in opposing directions? To proceed, we need to identify which practices impede progression. Hitherto, we bring to the fore an undiscussed practice, contextualizing how it impacts the ability to embed the available results into an overarching theory. We suggest that a STACKING THE DECK FALLACY – the tendency to engage differently with available evidence, directing focus to specific sub-samples – hampers theory formation. We put forth a proposal for making progress, building on the premise that what is lacking in the field is a unifying perspective that reconciles seemingly contradictory results. We suggest that the necessary shift of perspective towards progress crucially entails linking the notions of SPECTRUM and TRADE-OFF.
Publisher
Cambrigde University PressCitation
Leivada, Dentella, Masullo, Rothman. On trade-offs in bilingualism and moving beyond the stacking the deck fallacy. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2022Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Copyright 2022 The Author(s)