Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFischer, Johannes Maria
dc.contributor.authorHalbig, Josefine Mareile
dc.contributor.authorAugdal, Thomas Angell
dc.contributor.authorAngenete, Oskar W
dc.contributor.authorStoustrup, Peter
dc.contributor.authorKristensen, Kasper Dahl
dc.contributor.authorSkeie, Marit Slåttelid
dc.contributor.authorTylleskär, Karin
dc.contributor.authorRosén, Annika
dc.contributor.authorShi, Xie-Qi
dc.contributor.authorRosendahl, Karen
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-08T14:16:47Z
dc.date.available2023-02-08T14:16:47Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-02
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To examine the precision of imaging measures commonly used to assess mandibular morphology in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Secondly, to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the measurement of condylar height.<p> <p>Methods: Those included were children diagnosed with JIA during 2015–18 who had had an MRI, a CBCT of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) and a lateral cephalogram (ceph) of the head within one month of each other. Agreement within and between observers and methods was examined using Bland-Altman mean-difference plots and 95% limits of agreement (LOA). A 95% LOA within 15% of the sample mean was considered acceptable. Minimal detectable change (MDC) within and between observers was estimated.<p> <p>Results: 90 patients (33 males) were included, with a mean age of 12.8 years. For MRI, intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were relatively narrow for total mandibular length: 9.6% of the sample mean. For CBCT, condylar height, both intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were wide: 16.0 and 28.4% of the sample mean, respectively. For ceph, both intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were narrow for the SNA-angle and gonion angle: 5.9 and 8% of the sample mean, and 6.2 and 6.8%, respectively.<p> <p>Conclusions: We have identified a set of precise measurements for facial morphology assessments in JIA, including one MRI-based (total mandibular length), one CBCT-based (condylar height), and three ceph-based. Condylar height was higher for MRI than for CBCT; however, the measurement was too imprecise for clinical use. MDC was also determined for a series of measurements.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFischer J, Halbig J, Augdal Ta, Angenete O, Stoustrup P, Kristensen KD, Skeie MS, Tylleskär K, Rosén A, Shi XQ, Rosendahl K. Observer agreement of imaging measurements used for evaluation of dentofacial deformity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2022;51:20210478(6)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2028590
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/dmfr.20210478
dc.identifier.issn0250-832X
dc.identifier.issn1476-542X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/28517
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBritish Institute of Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.journalDentomaxillofacial Radiology
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleObserver agreement of imaging measurements used for evaluation of dentofacial deformity in juvenile idiopathic arthritisen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)