dc.contributor.author | Davidsen, Anne Herefoss | |
dc.contributor.author | Andersen, Stian | |
dc.contributor.author | Halvorsen, Peder Andreas | |
dc.contributor.author | Schirmer, Henrik | |
dc.contributor.author | Reierth, Eirik | |
dc.contributor.author | Melbye, Hasse | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-11T10:58:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-11T10:58:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-03-24 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective The objective of this study was to determine
the diagnostic accuracy in detecting valvular heart disease
(VHD) by heart auscultation, performed by medical doctors.<p>
<p>Design/methods A systematic literature search for
diagnostic studies comparing heart auscultation to
echocardiography or angiography, to evaluate VHD in
adults, was performed in MEDLINE (1947–November 2021)
and EMBASE (1947–November 2021). Two reviewers
screened all references by title and abstract, to select
studies to be included. Disagreements were resolved by
consensus meetings. Reference lists of included studies
were also screened. The results are presented as a
narrative synthesis, and risk of bias was assessed using
Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.
<p>Main outcome measures Sensitivity, specificity and
likelihood ratios (LRs).
<p>Results We found 23 articles meeting the inclusion
criteria. Auscultation was compared with full
echocardiography in 15 of the articles; pulsed Doppler was
used as reference standard in 2 articles, while aortography
and ventriculography was used in 5 articles. One article
used point-of-care ultrasound. The articles were published
from year 1967 to 2021. Sensitivity of auscultation
ranged from 30% to 100%, and specificity ranged from
28% to 100%. LRs ranged from 1.35 to 26. Most of the
included studies used cardiologists or internal medicine
residents or specialists as auscultators, whereas two used
general practitioners and two studied several different
auscultators.
<p>Conclusion Sensitivity, specificity and LRs of auscultation
varied considerably across the different studies. There is a
sparsity of data from general practice, where auscultation
of the heart is usually one of the main methods for
detecting VHD. Based on this review, the diagnostic utility
of auscultation is unclear and medical doctors should not
rely too much on auscultation alone. More research is
needed on how auscultation, together with other clinical
findings and history, can be used to distinguish patients
with VHD. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Davidsen AH, Andersen S, Halvorsen PA, Schirmer H, Reierth E, Melbye H. Diagnostic accuracy of heart auscultation for detecting valve disease:
a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2023 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2139000 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068121 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2044-6055 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/28943 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | BMJ | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | BMJ Open | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2023 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Diagnostic accuracy of heart auscultation for detecting valve disease:
a systematic review | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |