Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAamold, Svein
dc.contributor.authorGullickson, Charis Ann
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-10T11:12:36Z
dc.date.available2023-08-10T11:12:36Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-24
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this dissertation is to question art museum practices and the predisposition to regard state-funded art museums in Norway as "neutral" institutions. Neutrality is notoriously difficult to define, one possible definition could be “not being engaged, or decided, on either side of an issue” (Evans et al. 2020, 19). The question surrounding neutrality in museums is a complex one. Museum neutrality is the implicit assertion that museums cannot risk doing anything that might alienate government and private funders (Janes and Sandell 2019, 8). Can art museums be impartial with regard to the political and social issues governing our society? The public relies upon art museums to construct content and inform. Hence art museum professionals likewise tend to maintain the status quo and function within prevailing uncontroversial frameworks. This presents a challenge in today’s world in which there is increased reliance on corporations and private donors whose stakeholders are grounded in marketplace ideology. The dissertation chronicles patterns in art museum practices within a 21-year time span from 2002 to 2023. These include collections, marketing and public relations, curatorial, funding and sponsorship, and education (learning-and-engagement). To demonstrate some of the challenges facing today’s art museums I research case studies of Norway’s public state-funded art institutions: Nordnorsk Kunstmuseum in Romsa/Tromsø and Nasjonalmuseet in Oslo. These complex art institutions are characterized by contradictory ideologies and objectives; on the one hand they appear settler-colonial, and (conceivably) neo-liberal, while on the other hand, (possibly) decolonizing and socially engaged, “neutral,” yet intrinsically political. The open airing of facts in this study might suffice to incite change, specifically the decolonization of museums. As a feminist, recognizing the dilemmas and insisting on them is “staying with the trouble” (Haraway 2016). My objective is to show that a “turn” is urgent and necessary in art museums in Norway.en_US
dc.description.doctoraltypeph.d.en_US
dc.description.popularabstractThis dissertation sets out to “see” in art museum practices and question the predisposition to regard art museums in Norway as “neutral” institutions. With seeing I mean understanding systems of power. I contend that museums practitioners cannot see the structural challenges in their institutions of employment and that art museums in Norway today do not realize their potential as social actors. To demonstrate some of the challenges facing today’s art museums I research case studies of Norway’s public state-funded art institutions: Nordnorsk Kunstmuseum in Romsa/Tromsø and Nasjonalmuseet in Oslo. The open airing of facts in this study might suffice to incite change. As a feminist, recognizing the dilemmas and insisting on them is “staying with the trouble” (Haraway 2016). Although my study is from a Nordic perspective the issues concerning art museums are not unique to Norway. This study will contribute to broader research with regards to the challenges facing the international museum community. Globally art museums struggle for sustainability in the ongoing process of marketization of cultural institutions in the neoliberal era.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNorges forskningsråd in collaboration with Nordnorsk Kunstmuseumen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/29854
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universiteten_US
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen_US
dc.relation.haspart<p>Paper 1: Gullickson, C. (2022). The Feminist Killjoy Untangles Philanthropy: Norway’s National Museum (Nasjonalmuseet) and Fredriksen Family Art Company Limited. <i>Kunst og kultur, 105</i>(1-2022), 34–46. Also available in Munin at <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26715>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26715</a>. <p>Paper 2: Gullickson, C. (2023). Decolonizing the Museum. Unhighlighting Nordnorsk Kunstmuseum’s Iconic Laestadius Teaching Laplanders (1840). <i>Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies</i>. Also available in Munin at <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/29852>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/29852</a>. <p>Paper 3: Gullickson, C. Hacking from the Inside: The Art Museum as Activist. (Submitted manuscript).en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Humaniora: 000::Kunsthistorie: 120en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Humanities: 000::History of art: 120en_US
dc.titleTalking Back to Art Museum Practices: Seeing Public Art Museums in Norway Through the Lens of Institutional Critique, Feminism and Decolonialityen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.typeDoktorgradsavhandlingen_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)