Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKliemann, Nathalie
dc.contributor.authorRauber, Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorBertazzi Levy, Renata
dc.contributor.authorViallon, Vivian
dc.contributor.authorVamos, Eszter P
dc.contributor.authorCordova, Reynalda
dc.contributor.authorFreisling, Heinz
dc.contributor.authorCasagrande, Corinne
dc.contributor.authorNicolas, Genevieve
dc.contributor.authorAune, Dagfinn
dc.contributor.authorTsilidis, Konstantinos K
dc.contributor.authorHeath, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorSchulze, Matthias B
dc.contributor.authorJannasch, Franziska
dc.contributor.authorSrour, Bernard
dc.contributor.authorKaaks, Rudolf
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Barranco, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorTagliabue, Giovanna
dc.contributor.authorAgudo, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorPanico, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorArdanaz, Eva
dc.contributor.authorChirlaque, María-Dolores
dc.contributor.authorVineis, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorTumino, Rosario
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Cornago, Aurora
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Julie Louise Munk
dc.contributor.authorTjønneland, Anne
dc.contributor.authorSkeie, Guri
dc.contributor.authorWeiderpass, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Carlos Augusto
dc.contributor.authorGunter, Marc J
dc.contributor.authorMillett, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorHuybrechts, Inge
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-22T10:42:32Z
dc.date.available2023-08-22T10:42:32Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-06
dc.description.abstractBackground - Food processing has been hypothesised to play a role in cancer development; however, data from large-scale epidemiological studies are scarce. This study investigated the association between dietary intake according to amount of food processing and risk of cancer at 25 anatomical sites using data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.<p> <p>Methods - This study used data from the prospective EPIC cohort study, which recruited participants between March 18, 1991, and July 2, 2001, from 23 centres in ten European countries. Participant eligibility within each cohort was based on geographical or administrative boundaries. Participants were excluded if they had a cancer diagnosis before recruitment, had missing information for the NOVA food processing classification, or were within the top and bottom 1% for ratio of energy intake to energy requirement. Validated dietary questionnaires were used to obtain information on food and drink consumption. Participants with cancer were identified using cancer registries or during follow-up from a combination of sources, including cancer and pathology centres, health insurance records, and active follow-up of participants. We performed a substitution analysis to assess the effect of replacing 10% of processed foods and ultra-processed foods with 10% of minimally processed foods on cancer risk at 25 anatomical sites using Cox proportional hazard models.<p> <p>Findings - 521 324 participants were recruited into EPIC, and 450 111 were included in this analysis (318 686 [70·8%] participants were female individuals and 131 425 [29·2%] were male individuals). In a multivariate model adjusted for sex, smoking, education, physical activity, height, and diabetes, a substitution of 10% of processed foods with an equal amount of minimally processed foods was associated with reduced risk of overall cancer (hazard ratio 0·96, 95% CI 0·95–0·97), head and neck cancers (0·80, 0·75–0·85), oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (0·57, 0·51–0·64), colon cancer (0·88, 0·85–0·92), rectal cancer (0·90, 0·85–0·94), hepatocellular carcinoma (0·77, 0·68–0·87), and postmenopausal breast cancer (0·93, 0·90–0·97). The substitution of 10% of ultra-processed foods with 10% of minimally processed foods was associated with a reduced risk of head and neck cancers (0·80, 0·74–0·88), colon cancer (0·93, 0·89–0·97), and hepatocellular carcinoma (0·73, 0·62–0·86). Most of these associations remained significant when models were additionally adjusted for BMI, alcohol and dietary intake, and quality.<p> <p>Interpretation - This study suggests that the replacement of processed and ultra-processed foods and drinks with an equal amount of minimally processed foods might reduce the risk of various cancer types.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKliemann, Rauber, Bertazzi Levy, Viallon, Vamos, Cordova, Freisling, Casagrande, Nicolas, Aune, Tsilidis, Heath, Schulze, Jannasch, Srour, Kaaks, Rodriguez-Barranco, Tagliabue, Agudo, Panico, Ardanaz, Chirlaque, Vineis, Tumino, Perez-Cornago, Andersen, Tjønneland, Skeie, Weiderpass, Monteiro, Gunter, Millett, Huybrechts. Food processing and cancer risk in Europe: results from the prospective EPIC cohort study. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2023;7(3):e219-e232en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2150718
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00021-9
dc.identifier.issn2542-5196
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/30163
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.journalThe Lancet Planetary Health
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)en_US
dc.titleFood processing and cancer risk in Europe: results from the prospective EPIC cohort studyen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)