Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLaohaudomchok, Wisanti
dc.contributor.authorPhanprasit, Wantanee
dc.contributor.authorKonthonbut, Pajaree
dc.contributor.authorTangtong, Chaiyanun
dc.contributor.authorSripaiboonkij, Penpatra
dc.contributor.authorIkäheimo, Tiina
dc.contributor.authorJaakkola, Jouni J. K.
dc.contributor.authorNäyhä, Simo
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-31T09:54:40Z
dc.date.available2023-08-31T09:54:40Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-23
dc.description.abstractThe self-assessed threshold temperature for cold in the workplace is not well known. We asked 392 chicken industry workers in Thailand what they regard as the cold threshold (CT) and compared subgroups of workers using linear and quantile regressions by CT sextiles (percentiles P<sub>17</sub>, P<sub>33</sub>, P<sub>50</sub>, P<sub>67</sub>, and P<sub>83</sub>, from warmest to coldest). The variables of interest were sex, office work, and sedentary work, with age, clothing thermal insulation, and alcohol consumption as adjustment factors. The mean CT was 14.6 ◦C. Office workers had a 6.8 ◦C higher mean CT than other workers, but the difference ranged from 3.8 ◦C to 10.0 ◦C from P<sub>17</sub> to P<sub>83</sub>. Sedentary workers had a 2.0 ◦C higher mean CT than others, but the difference increased from 0.5 ◦C to 3.0 ◦C through P<sub>17</sub>–P<sub>83</sub>. The mean CT did not differ between sexes, but men had a 1.6–5.0 ◦C higher CT at P<sub>17</sub>–P<sub>50</sub> (>20 ◦C) and a 5.0 ◦C lower CT at P<sub>83</sub> (<10 ◦C). The CT was relatively high at warm (≥10 ◦C), dry (relative humidity <41%), and drafty (air velocity > 0.35 m/s) worksites. We conclude that office, sedentary, and female workers and those working at warm, dry, and draughty sites are sensitive to the coldest temperatures, whereas male workers are sensitive even to moderate temperatures.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLaohaudomchok W, Phanprasit W, Konthonbut P, Tangtong C, Sripaiboonkij, Ikäheimo TMA, Jaakkola JJK, Näyhä S. Self-Assessed Threshold Temperature for Cold among Poultry Industry Workers in Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH). 2023;20(3):2-21en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2141559
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph20032067
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/30587
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH)
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleSelf-Assessed Threshold Temperature for Cold among Poultry Industry Workers in Thailanden_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)