dc.contributor.author | Laohaudomchok, Wisanti | |
dc.contributor.author | Phanprasit, Wantanee | |
dc.contributor.author | Konthonbut, Pajaree | |
dc.contributor.author | Tangtong, Chaiyanun | |
dc.contributor.author | Sripaiboonkij, Penpatra | |
dc.contributor.author | Ikäheimo, Tiina | |
dc.contributor.author | Jaakkola, Jouni J. K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Näyhä, Simo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-31T09:54:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-31T09:54:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-01-23 | |
dc.description.abstract | The self-assessed threshold temperature for cold in the workplace is not well known. We asked 392 chicken industry workers in Thailand what they regard as the cold threshold (CT) and compared subgroups of workers using linear and quantile regressions by CT sextiles (percentiles P<sub>17</sub>, P<sub>33</sub>, P<sub>50</sub>, P<sub>67</sub>, and P<sub>83</sub>, from warmest to coldest). The variables of interest were sex, office work, and sedentary work, with age, clothing thermal insulation, and alcohol consumption as adjustment factors. The mean CT was 14.6 ◦C. Office workers had a 6.8 ◦C higher mean CT than other workers, but the difference ranged from 3.8 ◦C to 10.0 ◦C from P<sub>17</sub> to P<sub>83</sub>. Sedentary workers had a 2.0 ◦C higher mean CT than others, but the difference increased from 0.5 ◦C to 3.0 ◦C through P<sub>17</sub>–P<sub>83</sub>. The mean CT did not differ between sexes, but men had a 1.6–5.0 ◦C higher CT at P<sub>17</sub>–P<sub>50</sub> (>20 ◦C) and a 5.0 ◦C lower CT at P<sub>83</sub> (<10 ◦C). The CT was relatively high at warm (≥10 ◦C), dry (relative humidity <41%), and drafty (air velocity > 0.35 m/s) worksites. We conclude that office, sedentary, and female workers and those working at warm, dry, and draughty sites are sensitive to the coldest temperatures, whereas male workers are sensitive even to moderate temperatures. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Laohaudomchok W, Phanprasit W, Konthonbut P, Tangtong C, Sripaiboonkij, Ikäheimo TMA, Jaakkola JJK, Näyhä S. Self-Assessed Threshold Temperature for Cold among Poultry Industry Workers in Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH). 2023;20(3):2-21 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2141559 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ijerph20032067 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1661-7827 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1660-4601 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30587 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | MDPI | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2023 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Self-Assessed Threshold Temperature for Cold among Poultry Industry Workers in Thailand | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |