dc.contributor.author | Clay, Patricia M | |
dc.contributor.author | Ferretti, Johanna | |
dc.contributor.author | Bailey, Jennifer L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Goti, Leyre | |
dc.contributor.author | Dankel, Dorothy Jane | |
dc.contributor.author | Santurtun, Marina | |
dc.contributor.author | Fuller, Jessica Leyla | |
dc.contributor.author | Linke, Sebastian | |
dc.contributor.author | Schmidt, Jörn | |
dc.contributor.author | Nielsen, Kåre Nolde | |
dc.contributor.author | Goldsborough, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Groeneveld, Rolf | |
dc.contributor.author | Fraga, Ana Rita | |
dc.contributor.author | Elegbede, Isa | |
dc.contributor.author | Röckmann, Christine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-06T09:11:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-06T09:11:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-05-23 | |
dc.description.abstract | With increasing activities of multiple sectors in marine spaces, management of marine social–ecological systems requires more holistic approaches. Adopting such an approach, however, presents difficult institutional and disciplinary challenges. Here, we use the International Council
for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) as a case study on the implementation of ecosystem-based management (EBM) and integrated ecosystem
assessments (IEAs). ICES includes EBM and IEAs in its Science Priorities and established IEA Working Groups (WGs) to carry out regional IEAs.
But to what degree does this IEA WG work follow best practices? We examine policy documents, academic literature, and interview data from
chairs of all IEA WGs. Results indicate mixed success. All groups acknowledge the holistic goals of IEA, and many use the IEA model as laid
out by Levin et al. However, we found a significant variation in the degree to which the full model is applied. We identified two primary areas
for improvement: (1) integration of social and economic issues and (2) involvement of stakeholders. We offer examples of how WGs have been
making progress towards full IEAs, discuss how ICES can further support this transition, and suggest lessons with respect to the adoption of
EBM and IEAs more broadly. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Clay, Ferretti, Bailey, Goti, Dankel, Santurtun, Fuller, Linke, Schmidt, Nielsen, Goldsborough, Groeneveld, Fraga, Elegbede, Röckmann. Implementation of integrated ecosystem assessments in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea - Conceptualizations, practice, and progress. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2023;80(5):1516-1528 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2169551 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/icesjms/fsad079 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1054-3139 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1095-9289 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30723 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | ICES Journal of Marine Science | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2023 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Implementation of integrated ecosystem assessments in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea - Conceptualizations, practice, and progress | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |