dc.description.abstract | The primary objective of this study is to elucidate the underlying factors contributing to the observed differences
in fish consumption patterns. To accomplish this, a segmentation analysis was conducted on a representative
sample of 2207 individuals from Sweden based on the dual dimensions of both the volume and variety of fish
ingested. By scrutinizing these facets, the aim is to gain deeper insights into the distinct consumer archetypes
characterized by their diverse fish consumption habits, thus uncovering the catalysts and deterrents that influence these patterns.<p>
<p>The outcome of the segmentation analysis (i.e., two-step analysis: hierarchical clustering followed by nonhierarchical clustering technique) reveals four distinct consumer segments, each possessing unique attributes
concerning their preferences and behaviours regarding fish consumption. These segments are classified as the
“Frequent,” “Avid,” “Occasional,” and “Infrequent” fish consumers. The profiling of these segments is built on
factors encompassing consumers’ decision-making styles, involvement in food, environmental consciousness, as
well as pertinent socio-economic variables including income, geographical location, age, educational attainment,
and gender.
<p>Evident from the findings is the clear demarcation of two segments characterized by robust fish consumption
tendencies, specifically the “Frequent” and “Avid” segments. Subsequently, there exists a segment showcasing
moderately pronounced fish consumption behaviours labelled as the “Occasional” consumer group, in contrast to
a segment demonstrating a markedly diminished inclination for fish consumption, denoted as the “Infrequent”
consumer.
<p>All segments score high on habitual and brand-loyal purchasing intentions which emphasize the routine nature
of fish consumption behaviour. In a broader context, the study underscores the inherent utility of segmenting
consumers based on fish consumption volume and type, as this approach yields distinct consumer groups that can
be systematically addressed by stakeholders ranging from policy makers to producers and other seafood
advocates. | en_US |