Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHolm, Anne Marie Rubæk
dc.contributor.authorKnudsen, Steen Wilhelm
dc.contributor.authorMånsson, Malene
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Ditte Elmgreen
dc.contributor.authorNordfoss, Pauli Holm
dc.contributor.authorJohansson, Daniel Klingberg
dc.contributor.authorGramsbergen, Marthe
dc.contributor.authorHavmøller, Rasmus Worsøe
dc.contributor.authorSigsgaard, Eva Egelyng
dc.contributor.authorThomsen, Philip Francis
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Morten Tange
dc.contributor.authorMøller, Peter Daniel Rask
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-23T09:28:13Z
dc.date.available2023-11-23T09:28:13Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-20
dc.description.abstractThe anthropogenic impact on the world's ecosystems is severe and the need for non-invasive, cost-effective tools for monitoring and understanding those impacts are therefore urgent. Here, we combine two such methods in a comprehensive multi-year study; camera trapping (CT) and analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA), in river marginal zones of a temperate, wetland Nature Park in Denmark. CT was performed from 2015 to 2019 for a total of 8778 camera trap days and yielded 24,376 animal observations. The CT observations covered 87 taxa, of which 78 were identified to species level, and 73 were wild native species. For eDNA metabarcoding, a total of 114 freshwater samples were collected from eight sites in all four seasons from 2017 to 2018. The eDNA results yielded a total detection of 80 taxa, of which 74 were identified to species level, and 65 were wild native species. While the number of taxa detected with the two methods were comparable, the species overlap was only 20%. In combination, CT and eDNA monitoring thus yielded a total of 115 wild species (20 fishes, 4 amphibians, one snake, 23 mammals, and 67 birds), representing half of the species found via conventional surveys over the last ca. 20 years (83% of fishes, 68% of mammals, 67% of amphibians, 41% of birds, and 20% of reptiles). Our study demonstrates that a holistic approach combining two non-invasive methods, CT, and eDNA metabarcoding, has great potential as a cost-effective biomonitoring tool for vertebrates.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHolm, Knudsen, Månsson, Pedersen, Nordfoss, Johansson, Gramsbergen, Havmøller, Sigsgaard, Thomsen, Olsen, Møller. Holistic monitoring of freshwater and terrestrial vertebrates by camera trapping and environmental DNA. Environmental DNA. 2023en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2196305
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/edn3.481
dc.identifier.issn2637-4943
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/31857
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental DNA
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)en_US
dc.titleHolistic monitoring of freshwater and terrestrial vertebrates by camera trapping and environmental DNAen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)