Colonic distribution of FMT by different enema procedures compared to colonoscopy – proof of concept study using contrast fluid
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/31905Dato
2023-10-23Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Forfatter
Skjevling, Linn; Hanssen, Hege Marie; Valle, Per Christian; Goll, Rasmus; Juul, Frederik Emil; Arlov, Øystein; Johnsen, Peter HolgerSammendrag
Methods In eight participants, we administered contrast fluid (CF) with viscosity similar to an FMT in a crossover study design. First, CF was administered by colonoscopy, followed by an abdominal X-ray to visualize the CF distribution. Next, after four to eight weeks, participants were given CF, but as an enema, followed by a positioning procedure. X-rays were obtained before (enema ÷) and after (enema +) the positioning procedure.
Conclusion Proportion of participants with CF in cecum were 100% after colonoscopy, 50% after enema+and 38% after enema ÷. In the transverse colon, proportions were 100% (colonoscopy), 88% (enema +) and 63% (enema ÷). There were no adverse events.
Interpretation This study shows proof of concept for the distribution of FMT to proximal colon when delivered by enema. A positioning procedure after the enema slightly improves the proximal distribution. However, colonoscopy is the only method that ensures delivery to the cecum. Studies are needed to see if FMT colon distribution correlates with treatment effectiveness.
Trial registration The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05121285) (16/11/2021).