Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNikolaisen, Morten Andre
dc.contributor.authorArntzen, Cathrine
dc.contributor.authorEliassen, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorGramstad, Astrid
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-22T09:29:40Z
dc.date.available2024-08-22T09:29:40Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-19
dc.description.abstractMethods: A scoping review of the research literature was conducted. The study followed the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews and the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. The databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar. No limitations were set for the study design, time of publication, or country of origin, but only literature in English, Danish, Norwegian, or Swedish was considered for inclusion.<p> <p>Results: Twenty-seven articles were included. All of them originated from four Western and predominantly English-speaking countries: Australia, Canada, the UK, and the US. A thematic analysis identified six model categories that reflect different strategies for providing rehabilitation that promote CI in adults with ABI in rural areas. Sorting the model categories into micro (individual, interpersonal), meso (organisational, community), and macro (policy, society) levels highlighted that most of the included literature concentrates on microlevel issues at the individual or interpersonal level. Microlevel model categories encompass self-management and education, the use of navigators, and the incorporation of everyday life activities into rehabilitation. Far fewer articles addressed mesolevel issues such as service development in rural areas or the development of inclusive rural communities, and only a single article addressed policy development at the macro level.<p> <p>Conclusion: The relatively low number of included articles and limited geographical distribution of studies indicate that more research is needed on rehabilitation models aimed at promoting CI in adults with ABI in rural areas. Although we identified several existing approaches to rehabilitation service provision in rural areas, there is still a need to develop models that fully consider the complexity and long-term nature of CI after ABI. The results also demonstrate that CI in rural areas not only is dependent on professional service delivery aimed at the individual with ABI but also can be promoted by supporting significant others, developing inclusive communities, and improving policies. More knowledge on such issues may facilitate a wider reorganisation of care systems to enhance the CI of adults with ABI in rural areas. However, this will require more research with a wider scope than microlevel service delivery.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNikolaisen M, Arntzen C, Eliassen M, Gramstad A. Rehabilitation models for community integration of adults with acquired brain injury in rural areas: a scoping review. Rural and remote health. 2024;24(1):8281en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2257282
dc.identifier.doi10.22605/RRH8281
dc.identifier.issn1445-6354
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/34356
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJames Cook Universityen_US
dc.relation.journalRural and remote health
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleRehabilitation models for community integration of adults with acquired brain injury in rural areas: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)