Predictors of self-reported word-finding difficulties in glioma patients–a longitudinal study
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/34981Date
2024-04-10Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Author
Ottarsdottir, Edda Mary; Zamanzad Ghavidel, Fatemeh; Tveiten, Øystein Vesterli; Specht, Karsten; Wehling, Eike InesAbstract
Aims - The aim of the present study was to examine the occurrence of self-reported word-finding difficulties before and during the first year after glioma surgery. In addition, we investigated whether self-reported word-finding difficulties were predicted by standardized language tests and psychological distress.
Methods and procedures - Twenty-three patients with gliomas (grade 1–3) were assessed pre-surgery, at six and twelve months follow-up. Self-reported word-finding difficulties were addressed with the item I am able to find the right word(s) to say what I mean, from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Brain (FACT-Br). Confrontation naming was tested with the Boston Naming Test (BNT), word production with a semantic fluency test and word knowledge with a vocabulary test. Self-reported measures of psychological distress were assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Ordinal regression models were used to examine predictors of self-reported word-finding difficulties.
Outcomes and results - Word-finding difficulties were reported by 68% of the patients pre-surgery, increasing to 90% and 85% at the following assessments. Significant changes were observed in the magnitude of reported concerns between pre-surgery assessment and six months follow-up. Regression analyses demonstated that self-reported word-finding difficulties were predicted by psychological distress and vocabulary pre-surgery and vocabulary at six months follow-up, whereas confrontation naming and semantic fluency did not become significant in any of the assessments.
Conclusion - Our results indicate that self-reported word-finding difficulties occurred in a high percentage of glioma patients throughout the first year of illness. Patients reported increased difficulties after surgery that were not predicted by confrontation naming or semantic fluency but by vocabulary performance. The results imply further that psychological distress is a factor that should be taken into account. Self-reported function is an important supplement to objective testing and can provide indications about mental health status and the patients` perspective on language related challenges in everyday life.