Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHovda, Tone
dc.contributor.authorSagstad, Silje
dc.contributor.authorMoshina, Nataliia
dc.contributor.authorVigeland, Einar
dc.contributor.authorHofvind, Solveig Sand-Hanssen
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-28T08:24:24Z
dc.date.available2024-11-28T08:24:24Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-12
dc.description.abstractPurpose - To explore the association between radiologists’ interpretation scores, early performance measures and cumulative reading volume in mammographic screening.<p> <p>Method - We analyzed 1,689,731 screening examinations (3,379,462 breasts) from BreastScreen Norway 2012–2020, all breasts scored 1–5 by two independent radiologists. Score 1 was considered negative/benign and score ≥2 positive in this scoring system. We performed descriptive analyses of recall, screen-detected cancer, positive predictive value (PPV) 1, mammographic features and histopathological characteristics by breast-based interpretation scores, and cumulative reading volume by examination-based interpretation scores.<p> <p>Results - Counting breasts and not women, 3.9 % (132,570/3,379,462) had a score of ≥2 by one or both radiologists. Of these, 84.8 % (112,440/132,570) were given a maximum score 2. Total recall rate was 1.6 % (53,735/3,379,462), 69.3 % (37,220/53,735) given maximum score 2. Among the 0.3 % (9733/3,379,462) diagnosed with screen-detected cancer, 34.6 % (3369/9733) had maximum score 3. The percentages of recall, screen-detected cancer and PPV-1 increased by increasing the sum of scores assigned by two radiologists (p < 0.001 for trend). Higher proportions of masses were observed among recalls and screen-detected cancers with low scores, and higher proportions of spiculated masses were observed for high scores (p < 0.001). Proportions of invasive carcinoma, histological grade 3 and lymph node positive tumors were higher for high versus low scores (p < 0.001). The proportion of examinations scored 1 increased by cumulative reading volume.<p> <p>Conclusions - We observed higher rates of recall and screen-detected cancer and less favorable histopathological tumor characteristics for high versus low interpretation scores. However, a considerable number of recalls and screen-detected cancers had low interpretation scores.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHovda T, Sagstad S, Moshina N, Vigeland E, Hofvind S. Initial interpretation scores of screening mammograms and cancer detection in BreastScreen Norway. European Journal of Radiology. 2024;179
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2289584
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111662
dc.identifier.issn0720-048X
dc.identifier.issn1872-7727
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/35854
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Radiology
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.titleInitial interpretation scores of screening mammograms and cancer detection in BreastScreen Norwayen_US
dc.type.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel