dc.contributor.author | Carling, Johan Ulrik | |
dc.contributor.author | Berger, Sigurd | |
dc.contributor.author | Gjønnæss, Eyvind | |
dc.contributor.author | Røsok, Bård Ingvald | |
dc.contributor.author | Yakub, Sheraz | |
dc.contributor.author | Lassen, Kristoffer | |
dc.contributor.author | Fretland, Åsmund Avdem | |
dc.contributor.author | Dorenberg, Eric | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-06T09:21:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-06T09:21:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-09-03 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background Hepatic vein embolization in double vein embolization (DVE) can be performed with transhepatic,
transjugular or transfemoral access. This study evaluates the feasibility and technical success of using a transfemoral
access for the hepatic vein embolization in patients undergoing preoperative to induce hypertrophy of the future
liver remnant (FLR).<p>
<p>Material and methods Retrospective analysis of single center cohort including 17 consecutive patients. The
baseline standardized FLR was 18.2% (range 14.7–24.9). Portal vein embolization was performed with vascular plugs
and glue through an ipsilateral transhepatic access. Hepatic vein embolization was performed using vascular plugs.
Access for the hepatic vein was either transhepatic, transjugular or transfemoral. Technical success, number of hepatic
veins embolized and complications were registered. In addition, volumetric data including degree of hypertrophy
(DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR), and resection data were registered.
R: Seven of the 17 patients had transfemoral hepatic vein embolization, with 100% technical success. No severe
complications were registered. In the whole cohort, the median number of hepatic veins embolized was 2 (1–6). DH
was 8.6% (3.0–19.4) and KGR was 3.6%/week (1.4–7.4), without significant differences between the patients having transfemoral versus transhepatic /transjugular access (p=0.48 and 0.54 respectively). Time from DVE to surgery
was median 4.8 weeks (2.6–33.9) for the whole cohort, with one patient declining surgery, two having explorative
laparotomy and one patient having change of surgical strategy due to insufficient growth.
<p>Conclusion Transfemoral access is a feasible option with a high degree of technical success for hepatic vein embolization in patients with small future liver remnants needing DVE. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Carling, Berger, Gjønnæss, Røsok, Yakub, Lassen, Fretland, Dorenberg. Transfemoral hepatic vein access in double vein embolization – initial experience and feasibility. CVIR Endovascular. 2024;7(1) | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2298693 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s42155-024-00478-y | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2520-8934 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/36418 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | CVIR Endovascular | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2024 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Transfemoral hepatic vein access in double vein embolization – initial experience and feasibility | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |