Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCarling, Johan Ulrik
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Sigurd
dc.contributor.authorGjønnæss, Eyvind
dc.contributor.authorRøsok, Bård Ingvald
dc.contributor.authorYakub, Sheraz
dc.contributor.authorLassen, Kristoffer
dc.contributor.authorFretland, Åsmund Avdem
dc.contributor.authorDorenberg, Eric
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-06T09:21:35Z
dc.date.available2025-02-06T09:21:35Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-03
dc.description.abstractBackground Hepatic vein embolization in double vein embolization (DVE) can be performed with transhepatic, transjugular or transfemoral access. This study evaluates the feasibility and technical success of using a transfemoral access for the hepatic vein embolization in patients undergoing preoperative to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR).<p> <p>Material and methods Retrospective analysis of single center cohort including 17 consecutive patients. The baseline standardized FLR was 18.2% (range 14.7–24.9). Portal vein embolization was performed with vascular plugs and glue through an ipsilateral transhepatic access. Hepatic vein embolization was performed using vascular plugs. Access for the hepatic vein was either transhepatic, transjugular or transfemoral. Technical success, number of hepatic veins embolized and complications were registered. In addition, volumetric data including degree of hypertrophy (DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR), and resection data were registered. R: Seven of the 17 patients had transfemoral hepatic vein embolization, with 100% technical success. No severe complications were registered. In the whole cohort, the median number of hepatic veins embolized was 2 (1–6). DH was 8.6% (3.0–19.4) and KGR was 3.6%/week (1.4–7.4), without significant differences between the patients having transfemoral versus transhepatic /transjugular access (p=0.48 and 0.54 respectively). Time from DVE to surgery was median 4.8 weeks (2.6–33.9) for the whole cohort, with one patient declining surgery, two having explorative laparotomy and one patient having change of surgical strategy due to insufficient growth. <p>Conclusion Transfemoral access is a feasible option with a high degree of technical success for hepatic vein embolization in patients with small future liver remnants needing DVE.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCarling, Berger, Gjønnæss, Røsok, Yakub, Lassen, Fretland, Dorenberg. Transfemoral hepatic vein access in double vein embolization – initial experience and feasibility. CVIR Endovascular. 2024;7(1)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2298693
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s42155-024-00478-y
dc.identifier.issn2520-8934
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/36418
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.journalCVIR Endovascular
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleTransfemoral hepatic vein access in double vein embolization – initial experience and feasibilityen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)