Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorOnwuka, Justina Ucheojor
dc.contributor.authorGuida, Florence
dc.contributor.authorLangdon, Ryan
dc.contributor.authorJohansson, Mikael
dc.contributor.authorSeveri, Gianluca
dc.contributor.authorMilne, Roger L.
dc.contributor.authorDugué, Pierre-Antoine
dc.contributor.authorSouthey, Melissa C.
dc.contributor.authorVineis, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorSandanger, Torkjel Manning
dc.contributor.authorNøst, Therese Haugdahl
dc.contributor.authorChadeau-Hyam, Marc
dc.contributor.authorRelton, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorRobbins, Hilary A.
dc.contributor.authorSuderman, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorJohansson, Mattias
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-10T12:12:24Z
dc.date.available2025-02-10T12:12:24Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-30
dc.description.abstractObjective - Screening high-risk individuals with low-dose CT reduces mortality from lung cancer, but many lung cancers occur in individuals who are not eligible for screening. Risk biomarkers may be useful to refine risk models and improve screening eligibility criteria. We evaluated if blood-based DNA methylation markers can improve a traditional lung cancer prediction model.<p> <p>Methods and analysis - This study used four prospective cohorts with blood samples collected prior to lung cancer diagnosis. The study was restricted to participants with a history of smoking, and one control was individually matched to each lung cancer case using incidence density sampling by cohort, sex, date of blood collection, age and smoking status. To train a DNA methylation-based risk score, we used participants from Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study-Australia (n=648) and Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study-Sweden (n=380) based on five selected CpG sites. The risk discriminative performance of the methylation score was subsequently validated in participants from European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Italy (n=267) and Norwegian Women and Cancer-Norway (n=185) and compared with that of the questionnaire-based PLCOm2012 lung cancer risk model.<p> <p>Results - The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the PLCOm2012 model in the validation studies was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.75) compared with 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.77) for the methylation score model (<i>P</i><sub>difference</sub>=0.07). Incorporating the methylation score with the PLCOm2012 model did not improve the risk discrimination (AUC: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.77, <i>P</i><sub>difference</sub>=0.73).<p> <p>Conclusions - This study suggests that the methylation-based risk prediction score alone provides similar lung cancer risk-discriminatory performance as the questionnaire-based PLCOm2012 risk model.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOnwuka, Guida, Langdon, Johansson, Severi, Milne, Dugué, Southey, Vineis, Sandanger, Nøst, Chadeau-Hyam, Relton, Robbins, Suderman, Johansson. Blood-based DNA methylation markers for lung cancer prediction. BMJ Oncology. 2024en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2276627
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000334
dc.identifier.issn2752-7948
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/36454
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.journalBMJ Oncology
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 IGOen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 International (CC BY 3.0 IGO)en_US
dc.titleBlood-based DNA methylation markers for lung cancer predictionen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 3.0 International (CC BY 3.0 IGO)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 3.0 International (CC BY 3.0 IGO)