Deep learning-based postoperative glioblastoma segmentation and extent of resection evaluation: Development, external validation, and model comparison
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/36717Date
2024-11-16Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Author
Cepeda, Santiago; Romero, Roberto; Luque, Lidia; García-Pérez, Daniel; Blasco, Guillermo; Luppino, Luigi Tommaso; Kuttner, Samuel; Esteban-Sinovas, Olga; Arrese, Ignacio; Solheim, Ole Skeidsvoll; Eikenes, Live; Karlberg, Anna Maria; Pérez-Núñez, Ángel; Zanier, Olivier; Serra, Carlo; Staartjes, Victor E.; Bianconi, Andrea; Rossi, Luca Francesco; Garbossa, Diego; Escudero, Trinidad; Hornero, Roberto; Sarabia, RosarioAbstract
Methods - To develop the segmentation model, a training cohort from 3 research institutions and 3 public databases was used. Multiparametric MRI scans with ground truth labels for contrast-enhancing tumor (ET), edema, and surgical cavity, served as training data. The models were trained using MONAI and nnU-Net frameworks. Comparisons were made with currently available segmentation models using an external cohort from a research institution and a public database. Additionally, the model’s ability to classify EOR was evaluated using the RANO-Resect classification system. To further validate our best-trained model, an additional independent cohort was used.
Results - The study included 586 scans: 395 for model training, 52 for model comparison, and 139 scans for independent validation. The nnU-Net framework produced the best model with median Dice scores of 0.81 for contrast ET, 0.77 for edema, and 0.81 for surgical cavities. Our best-trained model classified patients into maximal and submaximal resection categories with 96% accuracy in the model comparison dataset and 84% in the independent validation cohort.
Conclusions - Our nnU-Net-based model outperformed other algorithms in both segmentation and EOR classification tasks, providing a freely accessible tool with promising clinical applicability.