Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAskar, Mohsen Gamal Saad
dc.contributor.authorTafavvoghi, Masoud
dc.contributor.authorSmåbrekke, Lars
dc.contributor.authorBongo, Lars Ailo
dc.contributor.authorSvendsen, Kristian
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-07T09:21:02Z
dc.date.available2025-05-07T09:21:02Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-23
dc.description.abstract<p><i>Aim</i> In this review, we investigated how Machine Learning (ML) was utilized to predict all-cause somatic hospital admissions and readmissions in adults. <p><i>Methods</i> We searched eight databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, ProQuest, OpenGrey, WorldCat, and MedNar) from their inception date to October 2023, and included records that predicted all-cause somatic hospital admissions and readmissions of adults using ML methodology. We used the CHARMS checklist for data extraction, PROBAST for bias and applicability assessment, and TRIPOD for reporting quality. <p><i>Results</i> We screened 7,543 studies of which 163 full-text records were read and 116 met the review inclusion criteria. Among these, 45 predicted admission, 70 predicted readmission, and one study predicted both. There was a substantial variety in the types of datasets, algorithms, features, data preprocessing steps, evaluation, and validation methods. The most used types of features were demographics, diagnoses, vital signs, and laboratory tests. Area Under the ROC curve (AUC) was the most used evaluation metric. Models trained using boosting tree-based algorithms often performed better compared to others. ML algorithms commonly outperformed traditional regression techniques. Sixteen studies used Natural language processing (NLP) of clinical notes for prediction, all studies yielded good results. The overall adherence to reporting quality was poor in the review studies. Only five percent of models were implemented in clinical practice. The most frequently inadequately addressed methodological aspects were: providing model interpretations on the individual patient level, full code availability, performing external validation, calibrating models, and handling class imbalance. <p><i>Conclusion</i> This review has identified considerable concerns regarding methodological issues and reporting quality in studies investigating ML to predict hospitalizations. To ensure the acceptability of these models in clinical settings, it is crucial to improve the quality of future studies.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAskar, Tafavvoghi, Småbrekke, Bongo, Svendsen. Using machine learning methods to predict all-cause somatic hospitalizations in adults: A systematic review. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(8)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2289107
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0309175
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/37006
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPLOSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAskar, M. (2025). Predicting Norwegian elderly hospitalizations using Machine Learning. (Doctoral thesis). <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/37007>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/37007</a>.
dc.relation.journalPLOS ONE
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleUsing machine learning methods to predict all-cause somatic hospitalizations in adults: A systematic reviewen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)