Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFábregas, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-22T12:32:44Z
dc.date.available2012-02-22T12:32:44Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses the possibility that Lexical Integrity effects can be explained by proposing that words are syntactic phases, thus eliminating these effects from the set of phenomena that argue in favour of the autonomy of morphology. The proposal is discussed from both a theoretical and an empirical perspective, and it is shown, in the first place, that the phases proposed to give account of some of these phenomena do not behave like syntactic phases and, secondly, that syntactic phases would be insufficient to cope with the impossibility of pronominal coreference with word internal constituents. It is concluded that, given our present understanding of syntax, Lexical Integrity effects still argue for the autonomy of morphology.en
dc.identifier.citationLingue e linguaggio 10(2011) nr. 1 s. 3-28en
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 826894
dc.identifier.doidoi: 10.1418/34537
dc.identifier.issn1720-9331
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/3850
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_3572
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subjectVDP::Humanities: 000::Linguistics: 010::General linguistics and phonetics: 011en
dc.subjectVDP::Humaniora: 000::Språkvitenskapelige fag: 010::Allmenn språkvitenskap og fonetikk: 011en
dc.subjectVDP::Humanities: 000::Linguistics: 010::Spanish language: 026en
dc.subjectVDP::Humaniora: 000::Språkvitenskapelige fag: 010::Spansk språk: 026en
dc.titleOn why word phases cannot account for Lexical Integrity Effectsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen
dc.typePeer revieweden


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record