Preoperative Rectal Cancer Management : Wide International Practice Makes Outcome Comparison Challenging : Reply
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/3918DOI
doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1039-1Dato
2011Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Forfatter
Augestad, Knut Magne; Lindsetmo, Rolv-Ole; Stulberg, J; Reynolds, H; Champagne, B; Leblanc, F; Heriot, AG; Senagore, A; Delaney, CSammendrag
In a letter to the editor Dr. Hottenrott provides valuable comments on our survey describing international preoperative rectal cancer management. In our opinion, three key messages are derived from our survey: First, most surgeons agree to neoadjuvant treatment when there is an
increased risk of finding histologically positive circumferential margins. In addition, we found more than 40 other indications for neoadjuvant treatment (see our Table 4). This emphasizes the need for an international agreement, as different indications for neoadjuvant treatment will select noncomparable groups of patients in outcome
studies. Second, we have shown (see our Table 6) that multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings significantly influence several important decisions in preoperative rectal cancer management. Interestingly, centers with regular MDT have a higher rate of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Odds Ratio [OR] = 3.62) and consider a threatened circumferential
resection margin (CRM) as indication for neoadjuvant treatment (OR = 5.67). We believe that MDT improves preoperative management of rectal cancer by increasing adherence to national guidelines. Similar discussions in international rectal cancer societies are needed aiming towards an international consensus statement. Finally, our survey revealed sparse use (35% of all cases) of MRI. The goal for the radiologic examination in
rectal cancer is to explore the tumor’s relation to nearby anatomical structures. This evaluation will conclude with TNM staging, important for chemoradiotheraphy, surgical treatment, and prognosis. Magnetic resonance imaging has a central role in this evaluation and should be the first choice radiologic modality. Not only is MRI crucial in detection of TNM stage but also plays a central role in determination of the tumor’s distance to the mesorectal fascia and the CRM. Magnetic resonance imaging has moderate sensitivity on T1 and T2 tumors, and should be
supplemented with rectal ultrasound.
Forlag
Springer VerlagSitering
World Journal of Surgery 35(2011) s. 1418-1419Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Følgende lisensfil er knyttet til denne innførselen: