Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSokolova, Svetlana
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-05T12:09:15Z
dc.date.available2013-12-05T12:09:15Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractThis article argues that metaphorical and non-metaphorical content find different expression on the constructional level. The hypothesis is supported by two empirical case studies of the Russian Locative Alternation verbs, based on the data from the Russian National Corpus: the unprefixed verb sypat’ ‘strew’ (which does not have an aspectual partner) and the unprefixed verb gruzit’ ‘load’ and its three perfective partners with the prefixes na-, za-, and po-. It is argued that metaphorical extensions of these Locative Alternation verbs have a strong relationship with elaborations (interactions between different constructions), on the one hand, and reduction (Locative Alternation constructions with a reduced or omitted participant), on the other. The results indicate differences in metaphorical behavior of different prefixes (even when they are used to form perfective partner verbs) and different constructions (some constructions are more often instantiated as metaphorical extensions than the other).en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Slavic Linguistics 21(2013) nr. 1 s. 171-204en
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1045141
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2013.0001
dc.identifier.issn1068-2090
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/5580
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_5279
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherSlavica Publishers Inc.en
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subjectVDP::Humanities: 000::Linguistics: 010::Russian language: 028en
dc.subjectVDP::Humaniora: 000::Språkvitenskapelige fag: 010::Russisk språk: 028en
dc.titleVerbal Prefixation and Metaphor: How Does Metaphor Interact with Constructions?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen
dc.typePeer revieweden


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record