Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBlix, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorBrurberg, Kjetil Gundro
dc.contributor.authorReierth, Eirik
dc.contributor.authorReinar, Liv Merete
dc.contributor.authorØian, Pål
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-17T13:10:12Z
dc.date.available2016-12-19T06:50:03Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractKey message: ST waveform analysis is purposed to be better for labor surveillance than conventional CTG. We quantified the efficacy of these two methods, assessing quality of the scientific evidence with the GRADE tool, and determined that evidence is insufficient to justify the use of ST waveform analysis as intrapartum monitoring.en
dc.descriptionAccepted manuscript version. Published version available: <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12828>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12828</a>en_US
dc.identifier.citationActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2015en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6349
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 1294418
dc.identifier.other10.1111/aogs.12828
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10037/8504
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_8072
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subject.en_US
dc.titleST waveform analysis vs. cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trialsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel