ST waveform analysis vs. cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

dc.contributor.author	Blix, Ellen
dc.contributor.author	Brurberg, Kjetil Gundro
dc.contributor.author	Reierth, Eirik
dc.contributor.author	Reinar, Liv Merete
dc.contributor.author	Øian, Pål
dc.date.accessioned	2016-02-17T13:10:12Z
dc.date.available	2016-12-19T06:50:03Z
dc.date.issued	2015
dc.description.abstract	Key message: ST waveform analysis is purposed to be better for labor surveillance than conventional CTG. We quantified the efficacy of these two methods, assessing quality of the scientific evidence with the GRADE tool, and determined that evidence is insufficient to justify the use of ST waveform analysis as intrapartum monitoring.	en
dc.description	Accepted manuscript version. Published version available: <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12828>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12828</a>	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2015	en_US
dc.identifier.cristinID	FRIDAID 1294418
dc.identifier.doi	10.1111/aogs.12828
dc.identifier.issn	0001-6349
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8504
dc.identifier.urn	URN:NBN:no-uit_munin_8072
dc.language.iso	eng	en_US
dc.publisher	Wiley	en_US
dc.rights.accessRights	openAccess
dc.subject	.	en_US
dc.title	ST waveform analysis vs. cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials	en_US
dc.type	Journal article	en_US
dc.type	Tidsskriftartikkel	en_US
dc.type	Peer reviewed	en_US