ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for farmasi
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (farmasi)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for farmasi
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (farmasi)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Seralini affair: degeneration of Science to Re-Science?

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8858
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-015-0049-2
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (972.3Kb)
(PDF)
Date
2015-08-29
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Fagan, John; Traavik, Terje; Bøhn, Thomas
Abstract
A paper reporting findings relevant to safety of the genetically modified (GM) maize NK603 and the herbicide Roundup (Séralini et al., Food Chem Toxicol. 50:4221–4231, 2012) was retracted against the wishes of the authors, and subsequently republished in another peer-reviewed journal (Séralini et al. Environ Sci Europe, doi:10.1186/s12302- 014-0014-5, 2014). These events exemplify a trend in which disputes, between interest groups vying for retraction and republication of papers that report controversial results, overshadow the normal scientific process in which peer-reviewed publication stimulates new research, generating new empirical evidence that drives the evolution of scientific understanding. This paper reviews the current status of research on safety of NK603 maize and Roundup herbicide for human and livestock health, and attempts to glean from recent developments insights relevant to risk assessment policy for GM crops and pesticides, as well as relevant to the scientific process in general. Our analysis of currently published evidence confirms NK603 and Roundup are kidney and liver toxicants at levels below current regulatory thresholds. Consequently, the regulatory status of NK603, glyphosate and Roundup requires reevaluation. Additionally, preliminary evidence indicates Roundup and NK603, individually and in combination, may increase tumor incidence and mortality. Follow-up long-term carcinogenicity studies, using test animal strains and numbers of animals that assure robust conclusions, are required to confirm/refute this preliminary evidence. The inherent tension between the scientific process and commercial interests of product developers necessitates implementation of safeguards that protect the scientific process and prevent degeneration of Science to Re-Science (typified by retraction and republication disputes).
Description
License:Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Publisher
SpringerOpen
Citation
Environmental Sciences Europe 2015, 27:19
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (farmasi) [394]

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)