Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Greg
dc.contributor.authorHausner, Vera Helene
dc.contributor.authorGrodzińska-Jurczak, Malgorzata
dc.contributor.authorPietrzyk-Kaszyńska, Agata
dc.contributor.authorOlszańska, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.authorPeek, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorRechciński, Marcin
dc.contributor.authorLægreid, Eiliv Jenssen
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-11T12:57:56Z
dc.date.available2016-03-11T12:57:56Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-25
dc.description.abstractProtected areas provide important ecosystem services globally but few studies have examined how cultural differences influence the distribution of cultural ecosystem values and management preferences. We used internet-based public participation GIS (PPGIS) in the countries of Norway and Poland to identify ecosystem values and management preferences in protected areas held by regional residents and site users. We found significant differences in the type and quantity of ecosystem values with Norwegians mapping more values relating to use of resources (e.g., hunting/fishing, gathering) and Polish respondents mapping more environmental values such as scenery, biological diversity, and water quality. With respect to management preferences, Norwegians identified more preferences for resource utilization while Polish respondents identified more preferences for conservation. Norwegian respondents were more satisfied with protected area management and local participation which can be explained by historical, legal, and cultural differences between the two countries. For Norway, biodiversity conservation in protected areas will continue to be guided by sustainable use of protected areas, rather than strict nature protection, with management favoring local board control and active public participation. For Poland, change in protected area management to enhance biodiversity conservation is less certain, driven by national environmental values that conflict with local values and preferences, continuing distrust in government, and low levels of civic participation. Differential efficacy in PPGIS methods – Norway with greater participation from household sampling and Poland with greater response using social media – suggest different strategies will be required for effective public engagement in protected area planning and management.en_US
dc.descriptionAccepted manuscript version. Published version at <a href=http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2015.09.006>http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2015.09.006</a>. License in accordance with the journal's policy - <a href=http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/>CC-BY-NC-ND</a>.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal for Nature Conservation 2015, 28:89-104en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1265298
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jnc.2015.09.006
dc.identifier.issn1617-1381
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/8897
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_8451
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 230330en_US
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 230330en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subjectCross-culturalen_US
dc.subjectEcosystem valuesen_US
dc.subjectPPGISen_US
dc.subjectProtected areasen_US
dc.subjectConservationen_US
dc.subjectPublic participationen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480::Økologi: 488en_US
dc.titleCross-cultural values and management preferences in protected areas of Norway and Polanden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel