dc.contributor.author | Ren, Jun | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Xun | |
dc.contributor.author | Sun, Jin | |
dc.contributor.author | Han, Mei | |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Guo-Yan | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Wen-Yuan | |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, Nicola | |
dc.contributor.author | Lewith, George | |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Jianping | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-14T07:40:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-03-14T07:40:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-06-03 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Evidence-based medicine promotes and
relies on the use of evidence in developing clinical
practice guidelines (CPGs). The Chinese healthcare
system includes both traditional Chinese medicine
(TCM) and Western medicine, which are expected to be
equally reflected in Chinese CPGs.
<p>Objective: To evaluate the inclusion of TCM-related
information in Western medicine CPGs developed in
China and the adoption of high level evidence.
<p>Methods: All CPGs were identified from the China
Guideline Clearinghouse (CGC), which is the main Chinese
organisation maintaining the guidelines issued by the
Ministry of Health of China, the Chinese Medical
Association and the Chinese Medical Doctors’ Association.
TCM-related contents were extracted from all the CPGs
identified. Extracted information comprised the institution
issuing the guideline, date of issue, disease,
recommendations relating to TCM, evidence level of the
recommended content and references supporting the
recommendations.
<p>Results: A total of 604 CPGs were identified, only a small
number of which (74/604; 12%) recommended TCM
therapy and only five guidelines (7%) had applied
evidence grading. The 74 CPGs involved 13 disease
systems according to the International Classification of
<p>Diseases 10th edition. TCM was mainly recommended in
the treatment part of the guidelines (73/74, 99%), and
more than half of the recommendations (43/74, 58%)
were related to Chinese herbal medicine (single herbs or
herbal treatment based on syndrome differentiation).
<p>Conclusions: Few Chinese Western medicine CPGs
recommend TCM therapies and very few provide evidence
grading for the TCM recommendation. We suggest that
future guideline development should be based on
systematic searches for evidence to support CPG
recommendations and involve a multidisciplinary approach
including TCM expertise. | en_US |
dc.description | Published version, also available at <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006572>http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006572</a> | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | BMJ Open 2015, 5(6) | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1331627 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006572 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2044-6055 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8907 | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:no-uit_munin_8498 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en_US |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | |
dc.subject | VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Community medicine, Social medicine: 801 | en_US |
dc.title | Is traditional Chinese medicine recommended in Western medicine clinical practice guidelines in China? A systematic analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |